ArticlePLoS genetics2016
The Adaptive Significance of Natural Genetic Variation in the DNA Damage Response of Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- No Evidence of Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution in Drosophila Reproductive Tract Transcriptomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Footprints of Worldwide Adaptation in Structured Populations of Drosophila melanogaster Through the Expanded DEST 2.0 Genomic Resource.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Intraspecific gene regulation in cis- and trans.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025Review
- Sex-Specific Ultraviolet Radiation Tolerance AcrossEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Combining Molecular, Macroevolutionary, and Macroecological Perspectives on the Generation of Diversity.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- The complex effects of modern oncogenic environments on the fitness, evolution and conservation of wildlife species.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Coevolution of longevity and female germline maintenance.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Temperature-Dependent Evolutionary Speed Shapes the Evolution of Biodiversity Patterns Across Tetrapod Radiations.Systematic biology · 2023Article
- Selection and geography shape male reproductive tract transcriptomes in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics · 2023Article
- Dynamics and stage-specificity of between-population gene expression divergence in the Drosophila melanogaster larval fat body.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Increased male investment in sperm competition results in reduced maintenance of gametes.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Transcriptional and mutational signatures of the Drosophila ageing germline.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Article
- Cross-species incompatibility between a DNA satellite and the Drosophila Spartan homolog poisons germline genome integrity.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Intermolecular Interactions Drive Protein Adaptive and Coadaptive Evolution at Both Species and Population Levels.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Broad geographic sampling reveals the shared basis and environmental correlates of seasonal adaptation ineLife · 2021Article
- Allelic polymorphism at foxo contributes to local adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.Molecular ecology · 2021Article
- Temperature, rainfall and wind variables underlie environmental adaptation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.Molecular ecology · 2021Article
- Contributions of cis- and trans-Regulatory Evolution to Transcriptomic Divergence across Populations in the Drosophila mojavensis Larval Brain.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Review
- Experimental evidence for effects of sexual selection on condition-dependent mutation rates.Nature ecology & evolution · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite decades of work, our understanding of the distribution of fitness effects of segregating genetic variants in natural populations remains largely incomplete. One form of selection that can maintain genetic variation is spatially varying selection, such as that leading to latitudinal clines. While the introduction of population genomic approaches to understanding spatially varying selection has generated much excitement, little successful effort has been devoted to moving beyond genome scans for selection to experimental analysis of the relevant biology and the development of experimentally motivated hypotheses regarding the agents of selection; it remains an interesting question as to whether the vast majority of population genomic work will lead to satisfying biological insights. Here, motivated by population genomic results, we investigate how spatially varying selection in the genetic model system, Drosophila melanogaster, has led to genetic differences between populations in several components of the DNA damage response. UVB incidence, which is negatively correlated with latitude, is an important agent of DNA damage. We show that sensitivity of early embryos to UVB exposure is strongly correlated with latitude such that low latitude populations show much lower sensitivity to UVB. We then show that lines with lower embryo UVB sensitivity also exhibit increased capacity for repair of damaged sperm DNA by the oocyte. A comparison of the early embryo transcriptome in high and low latitude embryos provides evidence that one mechanism of adaptive DNA repair differences between populations is the greater abundance of DNA repair transcripts in the eggs of low latitude females. Finally, we use population genomic comparisons of high and low latitude samples to reveal evidence that multiple components of the DNA damage response and both coding and non-coding variation likely contribute to adaptive differences in DNA repair between populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.