Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26950216›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2016

The Adaptive Significance of Natural Genetic Variation in the DNA Damage Response of Drosophila melanogaster.

Nicolas Svetec, Julie M Cridland, Li Zhao, David J Begun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Intraspecific gene regulation in cis- and trans.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Coevolution of longevity and female germline maintenance.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicolas SvetecDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Julie M CridlandDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Li ZhaoDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
David J BegunDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.

Funding

Investigating de novo gene evolution in Drosophila melanogasterR01GM110258 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BEGUN, DAVID J · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
Genomic analysis of adaptation in DrosophilaR01GM084056 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BEGUN, DAVID J · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS NIH GM084056NIGMS NIH HHS NIH GM110258NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084056NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite decades of work, our understanding of the distribution of fitness effects of segregating genetic variants in natural populations remains largely incomplete. One form of selection that can maintain genetic variation is spatially varying selection, such as that leading to latitudinal clines. While the introduction of population genomic approaches to understanding spatially varying selection has generated much excitement, little successful effort has been devoted to moving beyond genome scans for selection to experimental analysis of the relevant biology and the development of experimentally motivated hypotheses regarding the agents of selection; it remains an interesting question as to whether the vast majority of population genomic work will lead to satisfying biological insights. Here, motivated by population genomic results, we investigate how spatially varying selection in the genetic model system, Drosophila melanogaster, has led to genetic differences between populations in several components of the DNA damage response. UVB incidence, which is negatively correlated with latitude, is an important agent of DNA damage. We show that sensitivity of early embryos to UVB exposure is strongly correlated with latitude such that low latitude populations show much lower sensitivity to UVB. We then show that lines with lower embryo UVB sensitivity also exhibit increased capacity for repair of damaged sperm DNA by the oocyte. A comparison of the early embryo transcriptome in high and low latitude embryos provides evidence that one mechanism of adaptive DNA repair differences between populations is the greater abundance of DNA repair transcripts in the eggs of low latitude females. Finally, we use population genomic comparisons of high and low latitude samples to reveal evidence that multiple components of the DNA damage response and both coding and non-coding variation likely contribute to adaptive differences in DNA repair between populations.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsDNA DamageDNA RepairDrosophila melanogasterEmbryo, NonmammalianFemaleGenetics, PopulationUltraviolet Rays

Identifiers

PMID26950216
PMCPMC4780809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.