Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26950106›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Xanthones of Lichen Source: A 2016 Update.

Pierre Le Pogam, Joël Boustie

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unassuming Lichens: Nature's Hidden Antimicrobial Warriors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Xanthone Biosynthetic Pathway in Plants: A Review.Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Plants as Sources of Anti-Inflammatory Agents.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pierre Le PogamLaboratoire de Pharmacognosie, Equipe PNSCM, (ISCR UMR CNRS 6226), Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, 2 Avenue du Professeur Léon Bernard, 35043, Rennes Cédex, France. pierre.lepogam-alluard@univ-rennes1.fr.
Joël BoustieLaboratoire de Pharmacognosie, Equipe PNSCM, (ISCR UMR CNRS 6226), Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, 2 Avenue du Professeur Léon Bernard, 35043, Rennes Cédex, France. joel.boustie@univ-rennes1.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An update of xanthones encountered in lichens is proposed as more than 20 new xanthones have been described since the publication of the compendium of lichen metabolites by Huneck and Yoshimura in 1996. The last decades witnessed major advances regarding the elucidation of biosynthetic schemes leading to these fascinating compounds, accounting for the unique substitution patterns of a very vast majority of lichen xanthones. Besides a comprehensive analysis of the structures of xanthones described in lichens, their bioactivities and the emerging analytical strategies used to pinpoint them within lichens are presented here together with physico-chemical properties (including NMR data) as reported since 1996.

Indexed as

Chemical PhenomenaLichensMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMolecular StructureSymbiosisXanthonesXanthonesbioactivitybiosynthesisfungiislandicinlichexanthoneNMR spectroscopypolyketidessecalonic acidsthiomelin

Identifiers

PMID26950106
PMCPMC6273661
OpenAlexW2288231931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.