ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2016
Uncovering the profile of mutations of transforming growth factor beta-induced gene in Chinese corneal dystrophy patients.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel mutation in the TGFBI gene in a Moroccan family with atypical corneal dystrophy: a case report.BMC medical genomics · 2021Article
- Deterioration of Avellino corneal dystrophy in a Chinese family after LASIK.International journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Analysis ofJournal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Identification of a Heterozygous Mutation in theJournal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Two mutations in the transforming growth factor beta-induced gene associated with familial Lattice corneal dystrophy.International journal of ophthalmology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo uncover the mutations profile of transforming growth factor beta-induced (TGFBI) gene in Chinese corneal dystrophy patients and further investigate the characteristics of genotype-phenotype correlations.
methodsForty-two subjects (6 unrelated families including 15 patients and 8 unaffected members, and 19 sporadic patients) of Chinese origin were subjected to phenotypic and genotypic characterization. The corneal phenotypes of patients were documented by slit lamp photography. Mutation screening of the coding regions of TGFBI was performed by direct sequencing.
resultsWe detected four corneal dystrophy types. The most frequent phenotypes were granular corneal dystrophy (GCD) (including 3 families and 8 sporadic patients) and lattice corneal dystrophy (LCD) (including 2 families and 9 sporadic patients). The next phenotypes were corneal dystrophy of Bowman layer (CDB) (1 family and 1 sporadic patient) and epithelial basement membrane dystrophy (EBMD) (1 sporadic patient). Six distinct mutations responsible for TGFBI corneal dystrophies were identified in 30 individuals with corneal dystrophies. Those were, p.R124H mutation in 1 family and 2 sporadic patients with GCD, p.R555W mutation in 2 families and 3 sporadic patients with GCD, p.R124C mutation in 2 families and 7 sporadic patients with LCD, p.A620D mutation in 1 sporadic patient with LCD, p.H626R mutation in 1 sporadic patient with LCD, and p.R555Q in 1 family and 1 sporadic patient with CDB. No mutation was detected in the remaining 3 atypical GCD patients and 1 EBMD patient.
conclusionGCD and LCD are the most frequent phenotypes in Chinese population. R555W was the most common mutation for GCD; R124C was the most common mutation for LCD. Our findings extend the mutational spectrum of TFGBI, and this is the extensively delineated TGFBI mutation profile associated with the various corneal dystrophies in the Chinese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.