Ethical Issues in the Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Large sarcomatoid chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus extending into the inferior vena cava: a case report on the challenges and lessons from a fatal outcome.Annals of translational medicine · 2026
   Article
2. Factors associated with clinical trial participation for patients with renal cell carcinoma.Urologic oncology · 2023
   Article
3. A 25 year perspective on the evolution and advances in an understanding of the biology, evaluation and treatment of kidney cancer.Urologic oncology · 2021
   Review
4. Strengthening the foundation of kidney cancer treatment and research: revising the AJCC staging system.Annals of translational medicine · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.