Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26949407›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in zoology2016

White-nose syndrome survivors do not exhibit frequent arousals associated with Pseudogymnoascus destructans infection.

Thomas Mikael Lilley, Joseph Samuel Johnson, Lasse Ruokolainen, Elisabeth Jeannine Rogers, Cali Ann Wilson, Spencer Mead Schell, Kenneth Alan Field, DeeAnn Marie Reeder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. White adipose tissue remodeling in Little Brown Myotis (Myotis lucifugus) with white-nose syndrome.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ecology and impacts of white-nose syndrome on bats.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas Mikael LilleyBiology Department, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837 USA.
Joseph Samuel JohnsonBiology Department, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837 USA.
Lasse RuokolainenDepartment of Biosciences, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Science, Metapopulation Research Centre, University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 1, Helsinki, Finland.
Elisabeth Jeannine RogersBiology Department, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837 USA.
Cali Ann WilsonBiology Department, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837 USA.
Spencer Mead SchellBiology Department, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837 USA.
Kenneth Alan FieldBiology Department, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837 USA.
DeeAnn Marie ReederBiology Department, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhite-nose syndrome (WNS) has devastated bat populations in North America, with millions of bats dead. WNS is associated with physiological changes in hibernating bats, leading to increased arousals from hibernation and premature consumption of fat reserves. However, there is evidence of surviving populations of little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) close to where the fungus was first detected nearly ten years ago.

resultsWe examined the hibernation patterns of a surviving population of little brown myotis and compared them to patterns in populations before the arrival of WNS and populations at the peak of WNS mortality. Despite infection with Pseudogymnoascus destructans, the causative fungal agent, the remnant population displayed less frequent arousals from torpor and lower torpid body temperatures than bats that died from WNS during the peak of mortality. The hibernation patterns of the remnant population resembled pre-WNS patterns with some modifications.

conclusionsThese data show that remnant populations of little brown myotis do not experience the increase in periodic arousals from hibernation typified by bats dying from WNS, despite the presence of the fungal pathogen on their skin. These patterns may reflect the use of colder hibernacula microclimates by WNS survivors, and/or may reflect differences in how these bats respond to the disease.

Indexed as

HibernationMyotis lucifugusPeriodic arousalsPseudogymnoascus destructansSurvivalTorporWhite-nose syndrome

Identifiers

PMID26949407
PMCPMC4778317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.