Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26948883›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2016

Learning and Recognition of a Non-conscious Sequence of Events in Human Primary Visual Cortex.

Clive R Rosenthal, Samantha K Andrews, Chrystalina A Antoniades, Christopher Kennard, David Soto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Consensus Goals in the Field of Visual Metacognition.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Confidence Database.Nature human behaviour · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clive R RosenthalNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, England, UK. Electronic address: clive.rosenthal@clneuro.ox.ac.uk.
Samantha K AndrewsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, England, UK.
Chrystalina A AntoniadesNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, England, UK.
Christopher KennardNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, England, UK.
David SotoBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Paseo Mikeletegi, 20009 San Sebastian - Donostia, Spain; Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, 48013 Bilbao, Spain. Electronic address: d.soto@bcbl.eu.

Funding

Medical Research Council 89631Wellcome Trust WT073735MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human primary visual cortex (V1) has long been associated with learning simple low-level visual discriminations [1] and is classically considered outside of neural systems that support high-level cognitive behavior in contexts that differ from the original conditions of learning, such as recognition memory [2, 3]. Here, we used a novel fMRI-based dichoptic masking protocol-designed to induce activity in V1, without modulation from visual awareness-to test whether human V1 is implicated in human observers rapidly learning and then later (15-20 min) recognizing a non-conscious and complex (second-order) visuospatial sequence. Learning was associated with a change in V1 activity, as part of a temporo-occipital and basal ganglia network, which is at variance with the cortico-cerebellar network identified in prior studies of "implicit" sequence learning that involved motor responses and visible stimuli (e.g., [4]). Recognition memory was associated with V1 activity, as part of a temporo-occipital network involving the hippocampus, under conditions that were not imputable to mechanisms associated with conscious retrieval. Notably, the V1 responses during learning and recognition separately predicted non-conscious recognition memory, and functional coupling between V1 and the hippocampus was enhanced for old retrieval cues. The results provide a basis for novel hypotheses about the signals that can drive recognition memory, because these data (1) identify human V1 with a memory network that can code complex associative serial visuospatial information and support later non-conscious recognition memory-guided behavior (cf. [5]) and (2) align with mouse models of experience-dependent V1 plasticity in learning and memory [6].

Indexed as

HippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMemoryNontherapeutic Human ExperimentationPhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual Perceptionhippocampusimplicitnon-conscious memoryprimary visual cortexrecognition memoryrelationalsequence learning

Identifiers

PMID26948883
PMCPMC4819512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.