Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26948815›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2016

Enhancers as non-coding RNA transcription units: recent insights and future perspectives.

Wenbo Li, Dimple Notani, Michael G Rosenfeld

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 438 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
438citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

438 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Profiling Nascent RNA Transcription with TT-Seq.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

378 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenbo LiHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92037-0648, USA.
Dimple NotaniHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92037-0648, USA.
Michael G RosenfeldHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92037-0648, USA.

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Networks of regulatory enhancers dictate distinct cell identities and cellular responses to diverse signals by instructing precise spatiotemporal patterns of gene expression. However, 35 years after their discovery, enhancer functions and mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Intriguingly, recent evidence suggests that many, if not all, functional enhancers are themselves transcription units, generating non-coding enhancer RNAs. This observation provides a fundamental insight into the inter-regulation between enhancers and promoters, which can both act as transcription units; it also raises crucial questions regarding the potential biological roles of the enhancer transcription process and non-coding enhancer RNAs. Here, we review research progress in this field and discuss several important, unresolved questions regarding the roles and mechanisms of enhancers in gene regulation.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticAnimalsGene Expression RegulationGenomic InstabilityHumansModels, GeneticMultigene FamilyPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalRNA, UntranslatedTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticRNA, UntranslatedTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID26948815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.