Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26948305›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology2016

Oral Contraceptive Use and Prevalence of Self-Reported Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension in the United States.

Ye Elaine Wang, Caitlin Kakigi, Diego Barbosa, Travis Porco, Rebecca Chen, Sophia Wang, Yingjie Li, Kuldev Singh, Louis R Pasquale, Shan C Lin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Epidemiology of uveitis in a US population-based study.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ye Elaine WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Caitlin KakigiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Diego BarbosaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Travis PorcoDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Rebecca ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Sophia WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California; Kellogg Eye Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Yingjie LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California; Third Hospital of Nanchang University Medical School, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, People's Republic of China P.R.
Kuldev SinghDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Louis R PasqualeMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Glaucoma Service, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shan C LinDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: lins@vision.ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USNanchang University · CNStanford University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USW.K. Kellogg Foundation · US

Funding

Gene-Environment Interactions in GlaucomaR01EY015473 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI PASQUALE, LOUIS ROBERT · 2005 to 2021
$8.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015473NEI NIH HHS R01 EY EY015473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the association between oral contraceptive (OC) use and glaucoma prevalence in the United States.

designCross-sectional study.

participantsA total of 3406 female participants, aged 40 years or older, from the 2005 to 2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, who reported a presence or absence of glaucoma or ocular hypertension completed both the vision and the reproductive health questionnaires and underwent eye examinations.

methodsMultivariate regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between OC use and self-reported glaucoma or ocular hypertension (n = 231 cases), controlling for potential confounders, including age, ethnicity, systemic comorbidities such as hypertension and stroke, ocular diseases such as cataract and diabetic retinopathy, and reproductive health factors, including age at menopause, age at menarche, history of hormone replacement therapy, and gynecological surgical history.

main outcome measuresThe outcome variable was self-reported glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

resultsAfter adjusting for confounders, those with ≥3 years of OC use had greater odds (odds ratio, 1.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-3.07) of self-reported glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Other factors associated with higher glaucoma or ocular hypertension prevalence included older age, African American race, and later age at menarche.

conclusionsOral contraceptive use may be associated with increased risk of self-reported glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Indexed as

AdultContraceptives, OralCross-Sectional StudiesEstrogen Replacement TherapyEthnicityFemaleGlaucomaHumansMenarcheMenopauseNutrition SurveysOcular HypertensionOdds RatioPrevalenceSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesContraceptives, Oral

Identifiers

PMID26948305
PMCPMC4857187
OpenAlexW2271179904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.