Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26947881›Full record

ReviewTranslational oncology2016

Preclinical Data on Efficacy of 10 Drug-Radiation Combinations: Evaluations, Concerns, and Recommendations.

Helen B Stone, Eric J Bernhard, C Norman Coleman, James Deye, Jacek Capala, James B Mitchell, J Martin Brown

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How can we establish animal models of HIV-associated lymphoma?Animal models and experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Screening and Validation of Molecular Targeted Radiosensitizers.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021
    Article
  12. Moving Beyond the Standard of Care: Accelerate Testing of Radiation-Drug Combinations.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Characterization of cardiovascular injury in mice following partial-heart irradiation with clinically relevant dose and fractionation.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Helen B StoneRadiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, 20850, MSC 9727.
Eric J BernhardRadiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, 20850, MSC 9727. Electronic address: bernhardej@mail.nih.gov.
C Norman ColemanRadiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, 20850, MSC 9727.
James DeyeRadiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, 20850, MSC 9727.
Jacek CapalaRadiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, 20850, MSC 9727.
James B MitchellRadiation Biology Branch, National Cancer Institute, MSC 1002, 10 Center Dr, Bethesda, MD, 20892.
J Martin BrownStanford University, Radiation and Cancer Biology, CCSR-S Rm 1255, 269 Campus Dr, Stanford, CA, 94305.

Funding

Radiation-induced molecular targetsZIABC010670 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI COLEMAN, NORMAN · 2009 to 2024
$17.3M
Modulation of Therapeutic ResponseZIASC006321 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI MITCHELL, JAMES · 2009 to 2025
$17.3M
Development of Clinical Strategies to Prevent GBM Recurrences After RadiotherapyR01CA149318 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, JOHN MARTIN · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical testing of new therapeutic interventions requires comprehensive, high-quality preclinical data. Concerns regarding quality of preclinical data have been raised in recent reports. This report examines the data on the interaction of 10 drugs with radiation and provides recommendations for improving the quality, reproducibility, and utility of future studies. The drugs were AZD6244, bortezomib, 17-DMAG, erlotinib, gefitinib, lapatinib, oxaliplatin/Lipoxal, sunitinib (Pfizer, Corporate headquarters, New York, NY), thalidomide, and vorinostat.

methodsIn vitro and in vivo data were tabulated from 125 published papers, including methods, radiation and drug doses, schedules of administration, assays, measures of interaction, presentation and interpretation of data, dosimetry, and conclusions.

resultsIn many instances, the studies contained inadequate or unclear information that would hamper efforts to replicate or intercompare the studies, and that weakened the evidence for designing and conducting clinical trials. The published reports on these drugs showed mixed results on enhancement of radiation response, except for sunitinib, which was ineffective.

conclusionsThere is a need for improved experimental design, execution, and reporting of preclinical testing of agents that are candidates for clinical use in combination with radiation. A checklist is provided for authors and reviewers to ensure that preclinical studies of drug-radiation combinations meet standards of design, execution, and interpretation, and report necessary information to ensure high quality and reproducibility of studies. Improved design, execution, common measures of enhancement, and consistent interpretation of preclinical studies of drug-radiation interactions will provide rational guidance for prioritizing drugs for clinical radiotherapy trials and for the design of such trials.

Identifiers

PMID26947881
PMCPMC4800059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.