Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26947523›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2016

Efficacy and safety of procalcitonin guidance in reducing the duration of antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients: a randomised, controlled, open-label trial.

Evelien de Jong, Jos A van Oers, Albertus Beishuizen, Piet Vos, Wytze J Vermeijden, Lenneke E Haas, Bert G Loef, Tom Dormans, Gertrude C van Melsen, Yvette C Kluiters and 20 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 371 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
371citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
74.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01139489 nacompletednot on this map

Stop Antibiotics on Procalcitonin Guidance Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmsterdam UMC, location VUmcRan2009 to 2014Enrolled1,575ConditionsSepsis, Severe Sepsis, Septic ShockArmsprocalcitonin-guidance
NCT03683693 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Procalcitonin to Guide Antibiotic Stop in Neurocritical Care Patients. An Interventional Matched-cohort Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeneral Hospital GroeningeRan2018 to 2020Enrolled132ConditionsSepsisArmsProcalcitonin group
NCT04203524 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Impact of a Procalcitonin-Guided Algorithm on Antimicrobial Utilization in Critically Ill Cancer Patients with Sepsis: a Randomized Controlled Study (Pro-Can)

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Hussein Cancer CenterRan2019 to 2023Enrolled157ConditionsSepsis, Septic Shock, Neoplasm, Critical IllnessArmsProcalcitonin Levels, Control
NCT05756049 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Procalcitonin Protocol Use to Guide Antibiotic Therapy Duration in the Intensive Care Unit

TypeobservationalSponsorMethodist Health SystemRan2022 to 2024Enrolled208ConditionsComparing Antibiotic Duration of TherapyArmscompare antibiotic duration of therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

371 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 810 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and Safety of Procalcitonin-Guided Antibiotic Therapy versus Standard of Care for Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Beyond a Single Snapshot: Inflammatory Markers in Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article

311 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Evelien de JongVU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: ev.dejong@vumc.nl.
Jos A van OersElisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Albertus BeishuizenVU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Piet VosElisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Wytze J VermeijdenMedisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Lenneke E HaasDiakonessen Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Bert G LoefMartini Hospital, Groningen, Netherlands.
Tom DormansAtrium Hospital, Heerlen, Netherlands.
Gertrude C van MelsenMedical Centre Haaglanden, Haaglanden, The Hague, Netherlands.
Yvette C KluitersElisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Hans KempermanUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Maarten J van den ElsenSt Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jeroen A SchoutenCanisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jörn O StreefkerkBronovo Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands.
Hans G KrabbeMedisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Hans KieftIsala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands.
Georg H KlugeSlotervaart Hospital Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Veerle C van DamWestfries Gasthuis Hoorn, Netherlands.
Joost van PeltUniversity Medical Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Laura BormansAtrium Hospital, Heerlen, Netherlands.
Martine Bokelman OttenDiakonessen Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Auke C ReidingaMartini Hospital, Groningen, Netherlands.
Henrik EndemanDiakonessen Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Jos W TwiskVU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ewoudt M W van de GardeSt Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
Anne Marie G A de SmetUniversity Medical Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Jozef KeseciogluUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Armand R GirbesVU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Maarten W NijstenUniversity Medical Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Dylan W de LangeUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLAtrium Medisch Centrum Parkstad · NLMartini Ziekenhuis · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLBronovo Hospital · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLIsala · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLSint Lucas Andreas Hospital · NLSlotervaartziekenhuis · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLWestfriesgasthuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn critically ill patients, antibiotic therapy is of great importance but long duration of treatment is associated with the development of antimicrobial resistance. Procalcitonin is a marker used to guide antibacterial therapy and reduce its duration, but data about safety of this reduction are scarce. We assessed the efficacy and safety of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic treatment in patients in intensive care units (ICUs) in a health-care system with a comparatively low use of antibiotics.

methodsWe did a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label intervention trial in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Critically ill patients aged at least 18 years, admitted to the ICU, and who received their first dose of antibiotics no longer than 24 h before inclusion in the study for an assumed or proven infection were eligible to participate. Patients who received antibiotics for presumed infection were randomly assigned (1:1), using a computer-generated list, and stratified (according to treatment centre, whether infection was acquired before or during ICU stay, and dependent on severity of infection [ie, sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock]) to receive either procalcitonin-guided or standard-of-care antibiotic discontinuation. Both patients and investigators were aware of group assignment. In the procalcitonin-guided group, a non-binding advice to discontinue antibiotics was provided if procalcitonin concentration had decreased by 80% or more of its peak value or to 0·5 μg/L or lower. In the standard-of-care group, patients were treated according to local antibiotic protocols. Primary endpoints were antibiotic daily defined doses and duration of antibiotic treatment. All analyses were done by intention to treat. Mortality analyses were completed for all patients (intention to treat) and for patients in whom antibiotics were stopped while being on the ICU (per-protocol analysis). Safety endpoints were reinstitution of antibiotics and recurrent inflammation measured by C-reactive protein concentrations and they were measured in the population adhering to the stopping rules (per-protocol analysis). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01139489, and was completed in August, 2014.

findingsBetween Sept 18, 2009, and July 1, 2013, 1575 of the 4507 patients assessed for eligibility were randomly assigned to the procalcitonin-guided group (761) or to standard-of-care (785). In 538 patients (71%) in the procalcitonin-guided group antibiotics were discontinued in the ICU. Median consumption of antibiotics was 7·5 daily defined doses (IQR 4·0-12·7) in the procalcitonin-guided group versus 9·3 daily defined doses (5·0-16·6) in the standard-of-care group (between-group absolute difference 2·69, 95% CI 1·26-4·12, p<0·0001). Median duration of treatment was 5 days (3-9) in the procalcitonin-guided group and 7 days (4-11) in the standard-of-care group (between-group absolute difference 1·22, 0·65-1·78, p<0·0001). Mortality at 28 days was 149 (20%) of 761 patients in the procalcitonin-guided group and 196 (25%) of 785 patients in the standard-of-care group (between-group absolute difference 5·4%, 95% CI 1·2-9·5, p=0·0122) according to the intention-to-treat analysis, and 107 (20%) of 538 patients in the procalcitonin-guided group versus 121 (27%) of 457 patients in the standard-of-care group (between-group absolute difference 6·6%, 1·3-11·9, p=0·0154) in the per-protocol analysis. 1-year mortality in the per-protocol analysis was 191 (36%) of 538 patients in the procalcitonin-guided and 196 (43%) of 457 patients in the standard-of-care groups (between-group absolute difference 7·4, 1·3-13·8, p=0·0188).

interpretationProcalcitonin guidance stimulates reduction of duration of treatment and daily defined doses in critically ill patients with a presumed bacterial infection. This reduction was associated with a significant decrease in mortality. Procalcitonin concentrations might help physicians in deciding whether or not the presumed infection is truly bacterial, leading to more adequate diagnosis and treatment, the cornerstones of antibiotic stewardship.

fundingThermo Fisher Scientific.

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsBiomarkersCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCritical IllnessDrug Administration ScheduleDrug MonitoringHumansIntensive Care UnitsMiddle AgedNetherlandsProspective StudiesShock, SepticAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide

Identifiers

PMID26947523
OpenAlexW2289242065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.