ArticleJournal of nephrology2017
Updated genetic testing of Italian patients referred with a clinical diagnosis of primary hyperoxaluria.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Updated Genetic Testing of Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1 in a Chinese Population: Results from a Single Center Study and a Systematic Review.Current medical science · 2018Pooled it
- HOGA1 variants in Chinese patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 3: genetic features and genotype-phenotype relationships.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Primary hyperoxaluria in Italy: the past 30 years and the near future of a (not so) rare disease.Journal of nephrology · 2022Article
- A novel nonsense variant of the AGXT identified in a Chinese family: special variant research in the Chinese reference genome.BMC nephrology · 2021Article
- Meeting report of the "Symposium on kidney stones and mineral metabolism: calcium kidney stones in 2017".Journal of nephrology · 2019Article
- Tubular and genetic disorders associated with kidney stones.Urolithiasis · 2017Review
- Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1 with Homozygosity for a Double-mutatedIndian journal of nephrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary hyperoxaluria (PH) is a rare autosomal recessive disease commonly arising in childhood and presenting with nephrolithiasis, nephrocalcinosis and/or chronic renal failure. Three genes are currently known as responsible: alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase (AGXT, PH type 1), glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase (GRHPR, PH type 2), and 4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate aldolase (HOGA1, PH type 3). In our Centre, at the end of 2014 molecular diagnosis of PH1 had been performed in 80 patients, while one patient received a PH2 diagnosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifteen patients referred to our Centre and suspected to have PH on clinical grounds were negative for pathogenic variants in the entire coding sequence and exon-intron boundaries of the AGXT gene. Therefore, we extended the analysis to the AGXT promoter region and the GRHPR and HOGA1 genes.
resultsTwo patients were heterozygous for two novel AGXT-promoter variants (c.-647C > T, c.-424C > T) that were probably non pathogenic. One patient was homozygous for a novel HOGA1 variant of intron 2 (c.341-81delT), whose pathogenicity predicted by in silico splicing tools was not confirmed by a minigene splicing assay in COS-7 and HEK293T cells.
conclusionNew genetic subtypes of PH can be hypothesized in our patients, that may be caused by mutations in other gene encoding proteins of glyoxylate metabolism. Alternatively, some kind of mutations (e.g., deletions/duplications, deep intronic splicing regulatory variants) could be missed in a few cases, similarly to other genetic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.