Trial reportMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2016
Randomized controlled study of a mandibular advancement appliance for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children: A pilot study.
Trial report in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of rapid maxillary expansion and functional orthodontic treatment in children with sleep disordered breathing: a systematic review.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- The Orthodontist in Pediatric Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Systematic Review and Clinical Practice Framework.Cureus · 2026Review
- Dentofacial Orthopedic Treatment vs. Adenotonsillectomy in Children with Mild to Moderate OSA and Mandibular Retrognathia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Management of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome in children: what is the role of orthodontics? A scoping review.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Article
- The role of orthodontists in the multidisciplinary management of obstructive sleep apnea.Progress in orthodontics · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Orthodontic Treatment Modalities for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Diagnosis and Orthodontic Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Children-A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Mandibular Advancement Appliances in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Umbrella Review.Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2023Review
- Research trends and hotspots regarding treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Craniofacial Morphologic Predictors for Passive Myofunctional Therapy of Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using an Oral Appliance with a Tongue Bead.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Obstructive sleep apnea: focus on myofunctional therapy.Nature and science of sleep · 2018Review
- Effectiveness of functional orthodontic appliances in obstructive sleep apnea treatment in children: literature review.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe current limited evidence may be suggestive that mandibular advancement appliance (MAAs) result in improvements in AHI scores, but it is not possible to conclude that MAAs are effective to treat paediatric OSA.There are significant weaknesses in the existing evidence due primarily to absence of control groups, small sample sizes, lack of randomization and short-term results.
aimthe objective of the present study was to evaluate MAAs in children with OSA.
methodsChildren presenting an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) greater than or equal to one event per hour were considered to be apneic. This group of children with AHI greater than or equal to one was randomly divided through a draw into two subgroups: half of them in an experimental subgroup and half of them in a control subgroup. In the experimental subgroup, molds of each of these children's maxillary and mandibular arches were taken using standard molds and molding material. The control group did not use any intraoral device and did not undergo any type of treatment for OSAS. The MAAs used in this study had the aim of achieving mandibular advancement, thereby correcting the mandibular position and dental occlusion, and perhaps increasing the airway and treating OSAS. After 12 consecutive months of use of the mandibular advancement devices, polysomnography examinations using the same parameters as in the initial examinations were requested for both the experimental and the control subgroup.
resultsThere was a decrease in AHI in the experimental group and an increase in the control group, with statistical significance. These data were used to calculate the sample size, which was 28 children in total in the groups.
conclusionsThere was a decrease in AHI one year after implementing use of mandibular advancement devices, in comparison with the group that did not use these devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.