Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26945783›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2016

Powerful methods for detecting introgressed regions from population genomic data.

Benjamin K Rosenzweig, James B Pease, Nora J Besansky, Matthew W Hahn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. On the Use of the Jackknife to Compare RMolecular ecology resources · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. IntroUNET: identifying introgressed alleles via semantic segmentation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin K RosenzweigSchool of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
James B PeaseSchool of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Nora J BesanskyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Matthew W HahnSchool of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Notre Dame · US

Funding

Functional Genomics of Inversion 2La in Anopheles gambiaeR01AI076584 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI BESANSKY, NORA JESSIE · 2009 to 2013
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI076584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the types and functions of genes that are able to cross species boundaries-and those that are not-is an important step in understanding the forces maintaining species as largely independent lineages across the remainder of the genome. With large next-generation sequencing data sets we are now able to ask whether introgression has occurred across the genome, and multiple methods have been proposed to detect the signature of such events. Here, we introduce a new summary statistic that can be used to test for introgression, RNDmin , that makes use of the minimum pairwise sequence distance between two population samples relative to divergence to an outgroup. We find that our method offers a modest increase in power over other, related tests, but that all such tests have high power to detect introgressed loci when migration is recent and strong. RNDmin is robust to variation in the mutation rate, and remains reliable even when estimates of the divergence time between sister species are inaccurate. We apply RNDmin to population genomic data from the African mosquitoes Anopheles quadriannulatus and A. arabiensis, identifying three novel candidate regions for introgression. Interestingly, one of the introgressed loci is on the X chromosome, but outside of an inversion separating these two species. Our results suggest that significant, but rare, sharing of alleles is occurring between species that diverged more than 1 million years ago, and that application of these methods to additional systems are likely to reveal similar results.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetics, PopulationModels, GeneticAnimalsAnophelesChromosome InversionComputer SimulationGenetic SpeciationGenomicsHybridization, GeneticModels, StatisticalX Chromosomeadaptationbioinfomaticsgenomicspopulation geneticsspeciation

Identifiers

PMID26945783
PMCPMC4899106
OpenAlexW2293705186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.