Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26945759›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2016

Fleischner recommendations for the management of subsolid pulmonary nodules: high awareness but limited conformance - a survey study.

Onno M Mets, Pim A de Jong, Kaman Chung, Jan-Willem J Lammers, Bram van Ginneken, Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. How to diagnose pulmonary nodules: from screening to therapy.Translational lung cancer research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Onno M MetsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. o.m.mets@umcutrecht.nl.
Pim A de JongDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kaman ChungDiagnostic Imaging Analysis Group, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan-Willem J LammersDepartment of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bram van GinnekenDiagnostic Imaging Analysis Group, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cornelia M Schaefer-ProkopDiagnostic Imaging Analysis Group, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess awareness and conformance to the Fleischner society recommendations for the management of subsolid pulmonary nodules (SSN) in clinical practice.

methodsAn online questionnaire with four imaging cases was sent to 1579 associates from the European Respiratory Society and 757 from the European Society of Thoracic Imaging. Each respondent was asked to choose from several options which one they thought was the indicated management for the nodule presented. Awareness and conformance to the Fleischner recommendations (FR) were assessed and correlated to respondents characteristics.

resultsIn total, 119 radiologists (response rate 16.0 %) and 243 pulmonologists (response rate 16.5 %) were included. Awareness of the FR was higher in radiologists than in pulmonologists (93 % vs. 70 %, p < 0.001), as was implementation in daily practice (66 % vs. 47 %, p < 0.001). Radiologists conformed to FR in rates of 31, 69, 68, and 82 %, and pulmonologists in 12, 43, 70, and 75 % for cases 1 to 4, respectively. Overmanagement was common. Conformance in SSN management was associated with awareness, working in an academic practice, larger practice size, teaching residents, and higher SSN exposure.

conclusionsAlthough awareness of the Fleischner recommendations for SSN management is widespread, management choices in clinical practice show large heterogeneity. KEY POINTS: • Guideline awareness among clinicians is widespread, but conformance shows large heterogeneity. • Awareness and conformance is significantly higher among radiologists than pulmonologists. • Overmanagement is common, which may lead to avoidable financial and physical burden.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansSolitary Pulmonary NoduleTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdenocarcinomaEvidence based practiceGuideline adherenceQuestionnairesSolitary pulmonary nodule

Identifiers

PMID26945759
PMCPMC5052295
OpenAlexW2295457340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.