Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26945359›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2016

A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of MicroRNAs for Predicting Colorectal Cancer.

Lin Yan, Wenhua Zhao, Haihua Yu, Yansen Wang, Yuanshui Liu, Chao Xie

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Role of Exosomal Non-Coding RNAsMicroRNA (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Colorectal cancer: epigenetic alterations and their clinical implications.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Epigenetic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lin YanFrom the Department of Oncology and Pneumology (LY, YW), Shandong Jiaotong Hospital; Department of Oncology (WZ, YL) ; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery (HY), Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University; and The Third Department of Internal Medicine (CX), Shandong Tumor Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Wenhua Zhao
Haihua Yu
Yansen Wang
Yuanshui Liu
Chao Xie
Bridge University · SS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has been defined as a common malignancy due to its prevailing incidence in both males and females. Recently, the intrinsic value of microRNAs (miRNAs) with respect to early cancer diagnosis has been contentious as the diagnostic accuracy of miRNAs significantly varied across different studies. As a result of this, this pioneer meta-analysis was proposed to address this issue. Qualified studies were obtained through electronic systematical searching in Medline, Embase, and PubMed. On the basis of the random-effects model, we calculated the pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) to assess the diagnostic accuracy of miRNAs. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were implemented to determine how different confounding factors affect the overall diagnostic accuracy which were considered important sources of heterogeneity. All the statistical analyses were conducted with R 3.2.1 software. We incorporated 103 studies from 36 articles with a total of 3124 CRC patients and 2579 healthy individuals. MiRNAs have a good performance with the following pooled estimates: SEN = 0.769 (95% CI = 0.733-0.802), SPE = 0.806 (95% CI = 0.781-0.829), AUC = 0.857, and partial AUC = 0.773. As suggested by subgroup analyses and meta-regression, multiple miRNAs appeared to be more favorable than single miRNA (AUC: 0.918 > 0.813, partial AUC: 0.848 > 0.701, sensitivity = 0.853 > 0.718, specificity = 0.860 > 0.772). Compared with samples of plasma, blood, tissue, and feces, miRNA obtained from serum samples were more powerful for detecting CRC particularly in Asian. Our study provided exclusive evidence that multiple miRNAs extracted from serum samples had superior diagnostic performance over single miRNA for screening CRC. Therefore, this approach that is characterized by high specificity and noninvasive nature may assist in early diagnosis of CRC particularly in Asian.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMicroRNAsDimensional Measurement AccuracyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID26945359
PMCPMC4782843
OpenAlexW2332383699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.