Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26945353›Full record

ArticleMedicine2016

Perioperative Ventilatory Management in Cardiac Surgery: A French Nationwide Survey.

Marc-Olivier Fischer, Benoît Courteille, Pierre-Grégoire Guinot, Hervé Dupont, Jean-Louis Gérard, Jean-Luc Hanouz, Emmanuel Lorne, collaboration of ARCOTHOVA, CARGO Groups

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Perioperative Lung Protective Ventilatory Management During Major Abdominal Surgery: A Hungarian Nationwide Survey.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marc-Olivier FischerFrom the Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department (M-OF, BC, J-LG, J-LH), University Hospital of Caen; EA 4650 (MOF, JLH), Caen Basse-Normandie University, Esplanade de la Paix, Caen; Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department (P-GG, HD, EL), Amiens University Medical Center, Amiens; and INSERM U 1088 (P-GG, HD, EL), University of Picardie Jules Verne, Centre Universitaire de Recherche en Santé, Amiens cedex, France.
Benoît Courteille
Pierre-Grégoire Guinot
Hervé Dupont
Jean-Louis Gérard
Jean-Luc Hanouz
Emmanuel Lorne
collaboration of ARCOTHOVA, CARGO Groups

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protective ventilation is associated with a lower incidence of pulmonary complications. However, there are few published data on routine pulmonary management in adult cardiac surgery. The present study's primary objective was to survey pulmonary management in this high-risk population, as practiced by anesthesiologists in France. All 460 registered France-based cardiac anesthesiologists were invited (by e-mail) to participate in an online survey in January-February 2015. The survey's questionnaire was designed to assess current practice in pre-, per-, and postoperative pulmonary management. In all, 198 anesthesiologists (43% of those invited) participated in the survey. Other than during the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) per se, 179 anesthesiologists (91% of respondees) [95% confidence interval (CI): 87-95] used a low-tidal-volume approach (6-8 mL/kg), whereas techniques based on positive end-expiratory pressure and recruitment maneuvers vary greatly from 1 anesthesiologist to another. During CPB, 104 (53%) [95% CI: 46-60] anesthesiologists withdrew mechanical ventilation (with disconnection, in some cases) and 97 (49%) [95% CI: 42-56] did not prescribe positive end-expiratory pressure. One hundred sixty-five (83%) [95% CI: 78-88] anesthesiologists stated that a written protocol for peroperative pulmonary management was not available. Twenty (10%) [95% CI: 6-14] and 11 (5%) [95% CI: 2-8] anesthesiologists stated that they did use protocols for ventilator use and recruitment maneuvers, respectively. The preoperative period (pulmonary examinations and prescription of additional assessments) and the postoperative period (extubation, and noninvasive ventilation) periods vary greatly from 1 anesthesiologist to another. The great majority of French cardiac anesthesiologists use a low tidal volume during cardiac surgery (other than during CPB per se). However, pulmonary management procedures varied markedly from 1 anesthesiologist to another. There is a clear need for large clinical studies designed to identify best practice in pulmonary management.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresLung DiseasesPhysiciansAnesthesiologyAttitude of Health PersonnelCardiopulmonary BypassFranceHealth Care SurveysHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRespiration, ArtificialSurveys and QuestionnairesTidal Volume

Identifiers

PMID26945353
PMCPMC4782837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.