Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26944837›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings2016

Adherence to Asthma Guidelines in Children, Tweens, and Adults in Primary Care Settings: A Practice-Based Network Assessment.

Barbara P Yawn, Matthew A Rank, Michael D Cabana, Peter C Wollan, Young J Juhn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of adherence to guideline-directed therapy and risk factors for exacerbation in mild asthma: a retrospective chart review.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Medication Adherence in Children with Asthma.Patient preference and adherence · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Leveraging Electronic Health Records for Guideline-Based Asthma Documentation.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barbara P YawnDepartment of Research, Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: byawn47@gmail.com.
Matthew A RankDivision of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Michael D CabanaDepartments of Pediatrics, Epidemiology, and Biostatistics, Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco.
Peter C WollanDepartment of Research, Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, MN.
Young J JuhnDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

Assessing decision maker tools for Asthma: The Asthma APGARR01HS018431 · AHRQ · OLMSTED MEDICAL CENTER · PI YAWN, BARBARA P · 2010 to 2014
$2.5M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS 018431AHRQ HHS R01 HS018431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess primary care adherence to 2007 US asthma guidelines. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with persistent asthma aged 5 to 65 years from 22 primary care participating practices provided the data for this analysis of baseline information from the pragmatic randomized clinical trial the Asthma Tools Study. Using a combination of abstracted medical record data and patient-reported demographic information, we assessed the medical record documentation for elements of the 2007 US asthma guidelines. Elements assessed included documentation of (1) assessment of control, (2) factors that affect control (medication adherence evaluation, inhaler technique education, and evaluation for triggers), (3) self-management support (action plan), and (4) asthma medications prescribed (short-acting β-agonists and daily maintenance therapy). The baseline data was collected from March 16, 2009, to May 1, 2014.

resultsIn 1176 patients (285 children, 211 tweens, and 680 adults) from 16 family medicine and 6 pediatric practices across the United States, documented guideline adherence was highest for prescription of medications (88.0% for short-acting β-agonists and 70.4% for maintenance medications) and lowest for an asthma action plan (3.1%). Documentation of control (15.0%) and factors that affect control (inhaler technique education, 7.6%; medication adherence assessment, 32.5%; and allergy evaluation, 32.5%) was not common and even less common for adults compared with children. A total of 22.2% of the enrolled patients had no asthma-related visit in the year before enrollment. Adherence to the nonmedication elements were higher in practices located in cities of more than 250,000 people and cities that used electronic medical records. Older patient age was negatively associated with guideline adherence. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Adherence to asthma guidelines is poor in primary care practices, leaving many opportunities for improvement.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherencePractice Guidelines as TopicAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareUnited StatesYoung AdultAnti-Asthmatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26944837
PMCPMC6334649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.