Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26944260›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2016

Comparative transcriptomics of the nematode gut identifies global shifts in feeding mode and pathogen susceptibility.

James W Lightfoot, Veeren M Chauhan, Jonathan W Aylott, Christian Rödelsperger

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Meta-Analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James W LightfootDepartment for Evolutionary Biology, Max-Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Spemannstr. 35-39, Tübingen, Germany. james.lightfoot@tuebingen.mpg.de.
Veeren M ChauhanLaboratory of Biophysics and Surface Analysis, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Boots Science Building, Nottingham, UK. veeren.chauhan@nottingham.ac.uk.
Jonathan W AylottLaboratory of Biophysics and Surface Analysis, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Boots Science Building, Nottingham, UK. jon.aylott@nottingham.ac.uk.
Christian RödelspergerDepartment for Evolutionary Biology, Max-Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Spemannstr. 35-39, Tübingen, Germany. christian.roedelsperger@tuebingen.mpg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nematode Pristionchus pacificus has been established as a model for comparative studies using the well known Caenorhabditis elegans as a reference. Despite their relatedness, previous studies have revealed highly divergent development and a number of morphological differences including the lack of a pharyngal structure, the grinder, used to physically lyse the ingested bacteria in C. elegans.

resultsTo complement current knowledge about developmental and ecological differences with a better understanding of their feeding modes, we have sequenced the intestinal transcriptomes of both nematodes. In total, we found 464 intestine-enriched genes in P. pacificus and 724 in C. elegans, of which the majority (66%) has been identified by previous studies. Interestingly, only 15 genes could be identified with shared intestinal enrichment in both species, of which three genes are Hedgehog signaling molecules supporting a highly conserved role of this pathway for intestinal development across all metazoa. At the level of gene families, we find similar divergent trends with only five families displaying significant intestinal enrichment in both species. We compared our data with transcriptomic responses to various pathogens. Strikingly, C. elegans intestine-enriched genes showed highly significant overlaps with pathogen response genes whereas this was not the case for P. pacificus, indicating shifts in pathogen susceptibility that might be explained by altered feeding modes.

conclusionsOur study reveals first insights into the evolution of feeding systems and the associated changes in intestinal gene expression that might have facilitated nematodes of the P. pacificus lineage to colonize new environments. These findings deepen our understanding about how morphological and genomic diversity is created during the course of evolution.

Indexed as

Genes, HelminthTranscriptomeAnimalsBase SequenceCaenorhabditis elegansConserved SequenceEscherichia coliFeeding BehaviorGastrointestinal TractGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGene OntologyHedgehog ProteinsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHost-Pathogen InteractionsMolecular Sequence AnnotationHedgehog Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26944260
PMCPMC4779222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.