Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26944054›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Evaluation of DISCOVAR de novo using a mosquito sample for cost-effective short-read genome assembly.

R Rebecca Love, Neil I Weisenfeld, David B Jaffe, Nora J Besansky, Daniel E Neafsey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chromosome-level assembly, annotation and phylome of Pelobates cultripes, the western spadefoot toad.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A molecular toolkit for superorganisms.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R Rebecca LoveEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN, 46556, USA. rlove1@nd.edu.
Neil I WeisenfeldGenome Sequencing and Analysis Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA. neilw@broadinstitute.org.
David B JaffeGenome Sequencing and Analysis Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA. jaffe@broadinstitute.org.
Nora J BesanskyEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN, 46556, USA. nbesansk@nd.edu.
Daniel E NeafseyGenome Sequencing and Analysis Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA. neafsey@broadinstitute.org.

Funding

Functional Genomics of Inversion 2La in Anopheles gambiaeR01AI076584 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI BESANSKY, NORA JESSIE · 2009 to 2013
$2.4M
Elucidating the An. Funestus complexR21AI123491 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI BESANSKY, NORA JESSIE · 2016 to 2017
$437k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI076584NIAID NIH HHS R01AI076584NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI123491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDe novo reference assemblies that are affordable, practical to produce, and of sufficient quality for most downstream applications, remain an unattained goal for many taxa. Insects, which may yield too little DNA from individual specimens for long-read sequencing library construction and often have highly heterozygous genomes, can be particularly hard to assemble using inexpensive short-read sequencing data. The large number of insect species with medical or economic importance makes this a critical problem to address.

resultsUsing the assembler DISCOVAR de novo, we assembled the genome of the African malaria mosquito Anopheles arabiensis using 250 bp reads from a single library. The resulting assembly had a contig N50 of 22,433 bp, and recovered the gene set nearly as well as the ALLPATHS-LG AaraD1 An. arabiensis assembly produced with reads from three sequencing libraries and much greater resources. DISCOVAR de novo appeared to perform better than ALLPATHS-LG in regions of low complexity.

conclusionsDISCOVAR de novo performed well assembling the genome of an insect of medical importance, using simpler sequencing input than previous anopheline assemblies. We have shown that this program is a viable tool for cost-effective assembly of a modestly-sized insect genome.

Indexed as

Genome, InsectAllelesAnimalsAnophelesFemaleGene LibraryModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID26944054
PMCPMC4779211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.