SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2016
Enzyme replacement therapy with galsulfase for mucopolysaccharidosis type VI.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Therapeutic Options for Pulmonary and Sleep Disorders in Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) Patients: A Narrative Review.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Review
- Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric patients with type VI mucopolysaccharidosis.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2025Article
- Functional Analysis of Complex Structural and Splice-Altering Variants in theHuman mutation · 2025Article
- Delayed Onset Post-Operative Neurologic Deficit in a Patient With Mucopolysaccharidosis type VI: A Case Report.The Iowa orthopaedic journal · 2022Article
- Disease burden, management patterns and multidisciplinary clinical approaches for patients with MPS IVA and VI in selected Latin American Countries.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2021Article
- Systemic diseases and the cornea.Experimental eye research · 2021Review
- The Impact of Excluding Nonrandomized Studies From Systematic Reviews in Rare Diseases: "The Example of Meta-Analyses Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Patients With Mucopolysaccharidosis".Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- Intravenous Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Mucopolysaccharidoses: Clinical Effectiveness and Limitations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Odiparcil, a potential glycosaminoglycans clearance therapy in mucopolysaccharidosis VI-Evidence from in vitro and in vivo models.PloS one · 2020Article
- Recommendations for the management of MPS VI: systematic evidence- and consensus-based guidance.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2019Article
- GNPTAB c.2404C > T nonsense mutation in a patient with mucolipidosis III alpha/beta: a case report.BMC medical genetics · 2018Article
- What does mainstream media say about enzyme replacement therapies?Paediatrics & child health · 2018Article
- Mucopolysaccharidosis Type VI in a Great Dane Caused by a Nonsense Mutation in the ARSB Gene.Veterinary pathology · 2018Article
- Home infusion with Elosulfase alpha (VimizimMolecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2018Article
- Mucopolysaccharidosis type I, II and VI and response to enzyme replacement therapy: Results from a single-center case series study.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2017Article
- A selective screening program for the early detection of mucopolysaccharidosis: Results of the FIND project - a 2-year follow-up study.Medicine · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMucopolysaccharidosis type VI or Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome is a rare genetic disorder caused by the deficiency of arylsulphatase B. The resultant accumulation of dermatan sulphate causes lysosomal damage.The clinical symptoms are related to skeletal dysplasia (i.e. short stature and degenerative joint disease). Other manifestations include cardiac disease, impaired pulmonary function, ophthalmological complications, hepatosplenomegaly, sinusitis, otitis, hearing loss and sleep apnea. Intellectual impairment is generally absent. Clinical manifestation is typically by two or three years of age; however, slowly progressive cases may not present until adulthood.Enzyme replacement therapy with galsulfase is considered a new approach for treating mucopolysaccharidosis type VI.
objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of treating mucopolysaccharidosis VI by enzyme replacement therapy with galsulfase compared to other interventions, placebo or no intervention. SEARCH
methodsEletronic searches were performed on the Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Inborn Errors of Metabolism Trials Register, in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, LILACS, the Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease and ClinicalTrials.gov. Date of the last search of the Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Inborn Errors of Metabolism Trials Register: 05 February 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled clinical studies of enzyme replacement therapy with galsulfase compared to other interventions or placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened the studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. MAIN
resultsOne study was included involving 39 participants who received either enzyme replacement therapy with galsulfase (recombinant human arylsulphatase B) or placebo. This small study was considered to be of overall unclear quality, since the authors did not report how both the allocation generation and concealment were performed.The key finding at 24 weeks in the 12-minute walk test was a statistically significant mean difference of 92.00 meters between the two groups in favour of the galsulfase group (95% confidence interval 11.00 to 172.00). While week 24 results for the three-minute stair climb demonstrated some improvement in the treatment group as compared to the placebo group, this was not significant, mean difference 5.70 (95% confidence interval -0.10 to 11.50).A significant decrease in the urinary glycosaminoglycan levels was observed in favour of the galsulfase group at 24 weeks, mean difference -227.00 (95% confidence interval -264.00 to -190.00).In general, the dose of galsulfase was well tolerated and there were no significant differences in relation to adverse events. These events include drug-related adverse events, serious and severe adverse events, those during infusion, drug-related adverse events during infusion, and deaths. More infusion-related reactions were observed in the galsulfase group and were managed with interruption or slowing of infusion rate or administration of antihistamines or corticosteroids drugs. No deaths occurred during the study. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe results of one small study (based on 24-week randomised phase of the study and prior to the open-label extension) demonstrated that galsulfase is more effective than placebo in people with MPS VI, with significant improvements in the 12-minute walk test and a reduction in urinary glycosaminoglycans.There were no significant changes in cardiac or pulmonary functions, liver or spleen volume, overnight apnea-hypopnea, height and weight, quality of life and adverse effects.Further studies are needed to obtain more information on the long-term effectiveness and safety of enzyme replacement therapy with galsulfase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.