ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2016
Rare neurological channelopathies--networks to study patients, pathogenesis and treatment.
Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01060371 (Clinical Research Consortium for the Study of Cerebellar Ataxias), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Research Consortium for the Study of Cerebellar Ataxias (CRC-SCA) for the Natural History Study of and Genetic Modifiers in Spinocerebellar Ataxias (SCA)
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of rare movement disorders in Europe: outcome of surveys of the European Reference Network for Rare Neurological Diseases.European journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Reduced Function of the Glutathione S-Transferase S1 Suppresses Behavioral Hyperexcitability inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Protein surface topography as a tool to enhance the selective activity of a potassium channel blocker.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019Article
- Spinocerebellar ataxias: prospects and challenges for therapy development.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2018Review
- Importance of an International Registry for and Collaborative Research on Esophageal Atresia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Each of the thousands of rare neurological diseases requires a widely distributed network of centres, investigators and patients, so as to foster multidisciplinary investigations and involve sufficient numbers of patients in the discovery of disease pathogenesis and novel treatment. In this Review, we highlight the value of this collaborative approach in patient-oriented research into rare neurological channelopathies. Two networks, the Consortium for Clinical Investigations of Neurological Channelopathies (CINCH) and the Clinical Research Consortium for Studies of Cerebellar Ataxias (CRC-SCA), provide a link between patients with rare channelopathies and investigators who are studying disease pathogenesis and developing novel treatments. Interactions between patients, researchers and advocacy groups promote shared agendas that benefit patient education and recruitment, research collaboration and funding, and training and mentoring of junior investigators who are attracted to the study of the diseases that provide the focus for the two networks. Here, we discuss how linkage of national and international centres has enabled recruitment of study participants, provided opportunities for novel studies of pathogenesis, and facilitated successful clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.