Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26943726›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2016

Genotyping of Fusarium Isolates from Onychomycoses in Colombia: Detection of Two New Species Within the Fusarium solani Species Complex and In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing.

Marcela Guevara-Suarez, José Francisco Cano-Lira, María Caridad Cepero de García, Leticia Sopo, Catalina De Bedout, Luz Elena Cano, Ana María García, Adriana Motta, Adolfo Amézquita, Martha Cárdenas and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Species Diversity in the Fusarium solani (Neocosmospora) Complex and Their Pathogenicity for Plants and Humans.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A One Health Perspective to RecognizeJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. A 23 bpFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Marcela Guevara-SuarezLaboratorio de Micología y Fitopatología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Carrera 1 No 18A-10, Bogotá, Colombia.
José Francisco Cano-LiraUnitat de Micología, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut and IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Tarragona, Spain.
María Caridad Cepero de GarcíaLaboratorio de Micología y Fitopatología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Carrera 1 No 18A-10, Bogotá, Colombia.
Leticia SopoLaboratorio Especializado de Micología Médica (LEMM), Bogotá, Colombia.
Catalina De BedoutGrupo de Micología Médica y Experimental, Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas (CIB), Medellín, Colombia.
Luz Elena CanoEscuela de Microbiología, Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA), Medellín, Colombia.
Ana María GarcíaUnidad de Biología Celular y Molecular, Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas (CIB), Medellín, Colombia.
Adriana MottaFacultad de Medicina, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
Adolfo AmézquitaGrupo de Ecofisiología, Comportamiento y Herpetología (GECOH), Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Martha CárdenasLaboratorio de Micología y Fitopatología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Carrera 1 No 18A-10, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ana Espinel-IngroffVCU Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA.
Josep GuarroUnitat de Micología, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut and IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Tarragona, Spain.
Silvia RestrepoLaboratorio de Micología y Fitopatología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Carrera 1 No 18A-10, Bogotá, Colombia.
Adriana CelisLaboratorio de Micología y Fitopatología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Carrera 1 No 18A-10, Bogotá, Colombia. acelis@uniandes.edu.co.
Universidad de Los Andes · COCorporación para Investigaciones Biológicas · COAsociación Colombiana de Gastroenterología · COInstitut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili · ESUniversidad de Antioquia · COUniversidad El Bosque · COUniversidad Rovira i Virgili · ESVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fusariosis have been increasing in Colombia in recent years, but its epidemiology is poorly known. We have morphologically and molecularly characterized 89 isolates of Fusarium obtained between 2010 and 2012 in the cities of Bogotá and Medellín. Using a multi-locus sequence analysis of rDNA internal transcribed spacer, a fragment of the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (Tef-1α) and of the RNA-dependent polymerase subunit II (Rpb2) genes, we identified the phylogenetic species and circulating haplotypes. Since most of the isolates studied were from onychomycoses (nearly 90 %), we carried out an epidemiological study to determine the risk factors associated with such infections. Five phylogenetic species of the Fusarium solani species complex (FSSC), i.e., F. falciforme, F. keratoplasticum, F. lichenicola, F. petroliphilum, and FSSC 6 as well as two of the Fusarium oxysporum species complex (FOSC), i.e., FOSC 3 and FOSC 4, were identified. The most prevalent species were FOSC 3 (38.2%) followed by F. keratoplasticum (33.7%). In addition, our isolates were distributed into 23 haplotypes (14 into FOSC and nine into FSSC). Two of the FSSC phylogenetic species and two haplotypes of FSSC were not described before. Our results demonstrate that recipients of pedicure treatments have a lower probability of acquiring onychomycosis than those not receiving such treatments. The antifungal susceptibility of all the isolates to five clinically available agents showed that amphotericin B was the most active drug, while the azoles exhibited lower in vitro activity.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsColombiaDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFoot DermatosesFusariosisFusariumHaplotypesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMultilocus Sequence TypingOnychomycosisPeptide Elongation Factor 1PhylogenyRNA Polymerase IISequence Analysis, DNAAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsDNA, Ribosomal SpacerPeptide Elongation Factor 1RNA Polymerase IIHaplotypesPedicurePhylogenetic speciesSusceptibility

Identifiers

PMID26943726
OpenAlexW2291468221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.