Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26943675›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2016

Demographically-Based Evaluation of Genomic Regions under Selection in Domestic Dogs.

Adam H Freedman, Rena M Schweizer, Diego Ortega-Del Vecchyo, Eunjung Han, Brian W Davis, Ilan Gronau, Pedro M Silva, Marco Galaverni, Zhenxin Fan, Peter Marx and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Elephants as an animal model for self-domestication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. What made us "hunter-gatherers of words".Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 18 institutions in 9 countries.

Adam H FreedmanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Rena M SchweizerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Diego Ortega-Del VecchyoDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Eunjung HanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Brian W DavisNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Ilan GronauDepartment of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Pedro M SilvaCIBIO-UP, University of Porto, Vairão, Portugal.
Marco GalaverniISPRA, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
Zhenxin FanKey Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Peter MarxDepartment of Measurement and Information Systems, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Belen Lorente-GaldosICREA at Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Barcelona, Spain.
Oscar RamirezICREA at Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Barcelona, Spain.
Farhad HormozdiariDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Can AlkanBilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Carles VilàEstación Biológia de Doñana EBD-CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.
Kevin SquireDepartment of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Eli GeffenDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Josip KusakDepartment of Biology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Adam R BoykoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Heidi G ParkerICREA at Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Barcelona, Spain.
Clarence LeeLife Technologies, Foster City, California, United States of America.
Vasisht TadigotlaLife Technologies, Foster City, California, United States of America.
Adam SiepelSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, United States of America.
Carlos D BustamanteStanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Timothy T HarkinsLife Technologies, Foster City, California, United States of America.
Stanley F NelsonDepartment of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Tomas Marques-BonetICREA at Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Barcelona, Spain.
Elaine A OstranderNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Robert K WayneDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
John NovembreDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
University of California, Los Angeles · USCornell University · USBilkent University · TRBudapest University of Technology and Economics · HUCentro Nacional de Análisis Genómico · ESCold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USEstación Biológica de Doñana · ESInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva · ESIstituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale · ITNational Human Genome Research Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USPompeu Fabra University · ESSichuan University · CNStanford Medicine · USTel Aviv University · ILUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

Comparative Mammalian GenomicsZIAHG200377 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI OSTRANDER, ELAINE · 2012 to 2025
$24.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlling for background demographic effects is important for accurately identifying loci that have recently undergone positive selection. To date, the effects of demography have not yet been explicitly considered when identifying loci under selection during dog domestication. To investigate positive selection on the dog lineage early in the domestication, we examined patterns of polymorphism in six canid genomes that were previously used to infer a demographic model of dog domestication. Using an inferred demographic model, we computed false discovery rates (FDR) and identified 349 outlier regions consistent with positive selection at a low FDR. The signals in the top 100 regions were frequently centered on candidate genes related to brain function and behavior, including LHFPL3, CADM2, GRIK3, SH3GL2, MBP, PDE7B, NTAN1, and GLRA1. These regions contained significant enrichments in behavioral ontology categories. The 3rd top hit, CCRN4L, plays a major role in lipid metabolism, that is supported by additional metabolism related candidates revealed in our scan, including SCP2D1 and PDXC1. Comparing our method to an empirical outlier approach that does not directly account for demography, we found only modest overlaps between the two methods, with 60% of empirical outliers having no overlap with our demography-based outlier detection approach. Demography-aware approaches have lower-rates of false discovery. Our top candidates for selection, in addition to expanding the set of neurobehavioral candidate genes, include genes related to lipid metabolism, suggesting a dietary target of selection that was important during the period when proto-dogs hunted and fed alongside hunter-gatherers.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenomicsSelection, GeneticAnimalsDemographyDogsGenomeLipid MetabolismPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID26943675
PMCPMC4778760
OpenAlexW2292190728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.