Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26943624›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2016

Phylogenetic organization of bacterial activity.

Ember M Morrissey, Rebecca L Mau, Egbert Schwartz, J Gregory Caporaso, Paul Dijkstra, Natasja van Gestel, Benjamin J Koch, Cindy M Liu, Michaela Hayer, Theresa A McHugh and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Codon bias, nucleotide selection, and genome size predict in situ bacterial growth rate and transcription in rewetted soil.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Soil viral-host interactions regulate microplastic-dependent carbon storage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ember M MorrisseyCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Rebecca L MauCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Egbert SchwartzCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
J Gregory CaporasoCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Paul DijkstraCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Natasja van GestelCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Benjamin J KochCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Cindy M LiuCenter for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Michaela HayerCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Theresa A McHughCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Jane C MarksCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Lance B PriceCenter for Microbiomics and Human Health, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Bruce A HungateCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7337-1887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogeny is an ecologically meaningful way to classify plants and animals, as closely related taxa frequently have similar ecological characteristics, functional traits and effects on ecosystem processes. For bacteria, however, phylogeny has been argued to be an unreliable indicator of an organism's ecology owing to evolutionary processes more common to microbes such as gene loss and lateral gene transfer, as well as convergent evolution. Here we use advanced stable isotope probing with (13)C and (18)O to show that evolutionary history has ecological significance for in situ bacterial activity. Phylogenetic organization in the activity of bacteria sets the stage for characterizing the functional attributes of bacterial taxonomic groups. Connecting identity with function in this way will allow scientists to begin building a mechanistic understanding of how bacterial community composition regulates critical ecosystem functions.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiological EvolutionCarbon IsotopesEcologyEcosystemOxygen IsotopesPhenotypePhylogenyCarbon IsotopesOxygen Isotopes

Identifiers

PMID26943624
PMCPMC4989319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.