Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26943322›Full record

ReviewCell death and differentiation2016

Onto better TRAILs for cancer treatment.

D de Miguel, J Lemke, A Anel, H Walczak, L Martinez-Lostao

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell death and differentiation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 172 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
172citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
24.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

172 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 303 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A comprehensive investigation of associations between cell death pathways and molecular and clinical features in pan-cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Advances in the study of death receptor 5.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  12. Combination of multivalent DR5 receptor clustering agonists and histone deacetylase inhibitors for treatment of colon cancer.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Tetrandrine for Targeting Therapy Resistance in Cancer.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review

112 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

D de MiguelDepartamento de Bioquímica, Biología Molecular y Celular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
J LemkeUCL Cancer Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
A AnelDepartamento de Bioquímica, Biología Molecular y Celular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
H WalczakUCL Cancer Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
L Martinez-LostaoDepartamento de Bioquímica, Biología Molecular y Celular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Universidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversity College London · GBInstituto de Nanociencia y Materiales de Aragón · ES

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17341Cancer Research UK 20265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), also known as Apo-2 ligand (Apo2L), is a member of the TNF cytokine superfamily. By cross-linking TRAIL-Receptor (TRAIL-R) 1 or TRAIL-R2, also known as death receptors 4 and 5 (DR4 and DR5), TRAIL has the capability to induce apoptosis in a wide variety of tumor cells while sparing vital normal cells. The discovery of this unique property among TNF superfamily members laid the foundation for testing the clinical potential of TRAIL-R-targeting therapies in the cancer clinic. To date, two of these therapeutic strategies have been tested clinically: (i) recombinant human TRAIL and (ii) antibodies directed against TRAIL-R1 or TRAIL-R2. Unfortunately, however, these TRAIL-R agonists have basically failed as most human tumors are resistant to apoptosis induction by them. It recently emerged that this is largely due to the poor agonistic activity of these agents. Consequently, novel TRAIL-R-targeting agents with increased bioactivity are currently being developed with the aim of rendering TRAIL-based therapies more active. This review summarizes these second-generation novel formulations of TRAIL and other TRAIL-R agonists, which exhibit enhanced cytotoxic capacity toward cancer cells, thereby providing the potential of being more effective when applied clinically than first-generation TRAIL-R agonists.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisHumansNeoplasmsStructure-Activity RelationshipTNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsTNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandTNFSF10 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26943322
PMCPMC4832109
OpenAlexW2290145688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.