Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26942469›Full record

ReviewBiomedical materials (Bristol, England)2016

Bio-inspired 3D microenvironments: a new dimension in tissue engineering.

Chelsea M Magin, Daniel L Alge, Kristi S Anseth

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical materials (Bristol, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Compressive Buckling Fabrication of 3D Cell-Laden Microstructures.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chelsea M MaginSharklet Technologies, Inc. Aurora, CO, USA.
Daniel L AlgeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Kristi S AnsethDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Sharklet Technologies (United States) · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Osteogenic Hydrogel Niches to Promote hMSC Migration and DifferentiationR01DE016523 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI ANSETH, KRISTI S. · 2005 to 2023
$6.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomaterial scaffolds have been a foundational element of the tissue engineering paradigm since the inception of the field. Over the years there has been a progressive move toward the rational design and fabrication of bio-inspired materials that mimic the composition as well as the architecture and 3D structure of tissues. In this review, we chronicle advances in the field that address key challenges in tissue engineering as well as some emerging applications. Specifically, a summary of the materials and chemistries used to engineer bio-inspired 3D matrices that mimic numerous aspects of the extracellular matrix is provided, along with an overview of bioprinting, an additive manufacturing approach, for the fabrication of engineered tissues with precisely controlled 3D structures and architectures. To emphasize the potential clinical impact of the bio-inspired paradigm in biomaterials engineering, some applications of bio-inspired matrices are discussed in the context of translational tissue engineering. However, focus is also given to recent advances in the use of engineered 3D cellular microenvironments for fundamental studies in cell biology, including photoresponsive systems that are shedding new light on how matrix properties influence cell phenotype and function. In an outlook for future work, the need for high-throughput methods both for screening and fabrication is highlighted. Finally, microscale organ-on-a-chip technologies are highlighted as a promising area for future investment in the application of bio-inspired microenvironments.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsCellular MicroenvironmentAnimalsBiomimetic MaterialsBioprintingExtracellular MatrixHumansTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsTranslational Research, BiomedicalBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID26942469
PMCPMC11938994
OpenAlexW2300574650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.