ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2017
[Acceptance of dementia diagnostics by getriatric hospital patients : Comparison of various investigation methods with emphasis on FDG-PET imaging].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nuclear medical imaging as part of dementia diagnostics in psychiatric day-care clinics and inpatient care settings.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of people with dementia is continuously rising, in hospitals as well. For the diagnostics novel methods are available but the attitude of the patients to these methods is yet unknown.
objectiveThe aim of the study was to evaluatethe opinion of geriatric hospital patients with suspected dementia on the various possible methods of diagnosing dementia, especially fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Additionally, it was assessed if there are differences in toleration between imaging of the brain and conventional diagnostics by neuropsychological testing and if information on the diagnostic methods and the patient's physical or cognitive status influence their opinion.
methodWithin the framework of the iDSS001 clinical trial 90 geriatric hospital patients with suspected dementia were interviewed with respect to examinations performed for diagnosing dementia, e.g. anamnesis including physical and neurological examinations, neuropsychological testing, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and FDG-PET imaging.
resultsImaging of the brain was tolerated less than anamnesis including physical and neurological examinations, neuropsychological testing and cerebrospinal fluid analysis and patients also felt they were less informed about these procedures. The generally well-accepted FDG-PET imaging procedure was received slightly better than MRI. Cognitively impaired and less depressed patients were less willing to allow repeat MRI examinations.
conclusionThe results suggest that imaging of the brain is perceived by cognitively impaired hospital patients as being more burdensome than conventional diagnostics, such as neuropsychological testing. Improved care during the investigations as well as physical and organizational adjustments could increase the acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26942458What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.