Response to Sandford et al.: PRICKLE2 Variants in Epilepsy: A Call for Precision Medicine.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Decoding Epilepsy: Prickle2 and Multifaceted Molecular Pathway Connections.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025
   Review
2. Linking Cell Polarity to Cortical Development and Malformations.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Mutations in prickle orthologs cause seizures in flies, mice, and humans.2011
• Comment on
  PRICKLE2 Mutations Might Not Be Involved in Epilepsy.2016

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as