Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26942154›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2016

Long-term results of oncoplastic breast surgery with latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction: a pilot study of the objective cosmetic results and patient reported outcome.

Kyeong-Deok Kim, Zisun Kim, Jung Cheol Kuk, Jaehong Jeong, Kyu Sung Choi, Sung Mo Hur, Gui Ae Jeong, Jun Chul Chung, Gyu Seok Cho, Eung Jin Shin and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. A scoring system for 3D surface images of breast reconstruction developed using the Delphi consensus process.European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2020
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kyeong-Deok KimDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Zisun KimDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Jung Cheol KukDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Jaehong JeongDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Kyu Sung ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Sung Mo HurDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Gui Ae JeongDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Jun Chul ChungDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Gyu Seok ChoDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Eung Jin ShinDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Hyung Chul KimDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Sang-Gue KangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Min Hyuk LeeDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Cheol Wan LimDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe goal of oncoplastic breast surgery is to restore the appearance of the breast and improve patient satisfaction. Thus, the assessment of cosmetic results and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) using appropriately constructed and validated instruments is essential. The aim of the present study was to assess the long-term objective cosmetic results and corresponding PROs after oncoplastic breast surgery.

methodsCosmetic results were assessed by the patients, a medical panel, and a computer program (BCCT.core). PROs were assessed using BREAST-Q, a questionnaire that measures the perception of patients having breast surgery. The cosmetic results and PROs were analyzed in patients who underwent quadrantectomy and partial breast reconstruction utilizing the latissimus dorsi flap.

resultsThe mean duration of the follow-up period was 91.6 months (range, 33.3-171.0 months), and mean age of the patients was 51 years old (range, 33-72 years). The mean tumor size was 2.1 cm (range, 0.9-5.5 cm). There was fair agreement between the medical panel and BCCT.core score (K = 0.32, P < 0.001), and a statistically significant correlation between the BCCT.core score and medical panel cosmetic results was identified (r = 0.606, P < 0.001). A better BCCT.core result was related to a higher PRO of each BREAST-Q domain-satisfaction with breasts (R(2) = 0.070, P = 0.039), satisfaction with outcome (R(2) = 0.087, P = 0.021), psychosocial well-being (R(2) = 0.085, P = 0.023), sexual well-being (R(2) = 0.082, P = 0.029), and satisfaction with information (R(2) = 0.064, P = 0.049).

conclusionOur long-term results of oncoplastic surgery achieved a high level of patient satisfaction with good cosmetic results. The medical panel and BCCT.core results correlated well with the PROs of the patients using valid, reliable, and procedure-specific measures.

Indexed as

BreastCarcinomaQuality of lifeSuperficial back musclesSurgical flap

Identifiers

PMID26942154
PMCPMC4773455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.