Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26942122›Full record

ArticleJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry2015

Analysis of the greater palatine foramen in a Lebanese population using cone-beam computed tomography technology.

Georges Aoun, Ibrahim Nasseh, Sayde Sokhn, Maria Saadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gender-Specific Variations in Greater Palatine Foramen Anatomy: Insights from CBCT Scans in the North Cyprus Population.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  5. Computed tomographic features of adenoid cystic carcinoma in the palate.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Georges AounDepartment of Oral Pathology and Diagnosis, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Fundamental Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ibrahim NassehDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Sayde SokhnDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Maria SaadehDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Lebanese University, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Lebanese University · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to describe the diameter and the position of the greater palatine foramen (GPF) in relation to adjacent anatomical landmarks in the maxilla in a Lebanese population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) technology. MATERIALS AND

methodsCBCT images of 58 Lebanese adult patients were included in this study and a total of 116 GPF were evaluated bilaterally. The diameter of the GPF and its position relative to the maxillary molars, and distances to the midline maxillary suture and to the anterior nasal spine were analyzed.

resultsOf all foramina assessed, 41.38% were located opposite to the third molar, 29.31% were distal to it, 27.59% were between the second and the third, and only 1.72% were opposite to the second. The average diameter was 5.633 mm on the right and 5.723 mm on the left, and the average distances to midline maxillary suture and anterior nasal spine were 16.228 mm and 48.294 mm on the right and 14.907 mm and 48.122 mm on the left, respectively.

conclusionWithin the limits of this study, we conclude that in Lebanese patients, the GPF location is variable, very rarely opposite to the second molar, and more closely related to the third, but may present mesial or distal to it in one-fourth of patients.

Indexed as

Cone-beam computed tomographygreater palatine foramenLebanese population

Identifiers

PMID26942122
PMCPMC4756572
OpenAlexW2210062126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.