Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26942074›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology

Biological network-driven gene selection identifies a stromal immune module as a key determinant of triple-negative breast carcinoma prognosis.

H Bonsang-Kitzis, B Sadacca, A S Hamy-Petit, M Moarii, A Pinheiro, C Laurent, F Reyal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Recent advances in nanotheranostics for triple negative breast cancer treatment.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Classification of triple-negative breast cancers based on Immunogenomic profiling.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The immune contexture in cancer prognosis and treatment.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

H Bonsang-KitzisResidual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory; RT2Lab; Translational Research Department; Institut Curie; Paris, France; U932 Immunity and Cancer; INSERM; Institut Curie; Paris, France; Department of Surgery; Institut Curie; Paris, France.
B SadaccaResidual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory; RT2Lab; Translational Research Department; Institut Curie; Paris, France; U932 Immunity and Cancer; INSERM; Institut Curie; Paris, France; Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Modélisation d'Evry, Université d'Évry Val d'Essonne; UMR CNRS 8071, ENSIIE, USC INRA, France.
A S Hamy-PetitResidual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory; RT2Lab; Translational Research Department; Institut Curie; Paris, France; U932 Immunity and Cancer; INSERM; Institut Curie; Paris, France.
M MoariiMines Paristech; PSL-Research University; CBIO-Centre for Computational Biology; Mines ParisTech; Fontainebleau, France; U900, INSERM; Institut Curie; Paris, France.
A PinheiroResidual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory; RT2Lab; Translational Research Department; Institut Curie; Paris, France; U932 Immunity and Cancer; INSERM; Institut Curie; Paris, France.
C LaurentResidual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory; RT2Lab; Translational Research Department; Institut Curie; Paris, France; U932 Immunity and Cancer; INSERM; Institut Curie; Paris, France.
F ReyalResidual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory; RT2Lab; Translational Research Department; Institut Curie; Paris, France; U932 Immunity and Cancer; INSERM; Institut Curie; Paris, France; Department of Surgery; Institut Curie; Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous group of aggressive breast cancers for which no targeted treatment is available. Robust tools for TNBC classification are required, to improve the prediction of prognosis and to develop novel therapeutic interventions. We analyzed 3,247 primary human breast cancer samples from 21 publicly available datasets, using a five-step method: (1) selection of TNBC samples by bimodal filtering on ER-HER2 and PR, (2) normalization of the selected TNBC samples, (3) selection of the most variant genes, (4) identification of gene clusters and biological gene selection within gene clusters on the basis of String© database connections and gene-expression correlations, (5) summarization of each gene cluster in a metagene. We then assessed the ability of these metagenes to predict prognosis, on an external public dataset (METABRIC). Our analysis of gene expression (GE) in 557 TNBCs from 21 public datasets identified a six-metagene signature (167 genes) in which the metagenes were enriched in different gene ontologies. The gene clusters were named as follows: Immunity1, Immunity2, Proliferation/DNA damage, AR-like, Matrix/Invasion1 and Matrix2 clusters respectively. This signature was particularly robust for the identification of TNBC subtypes across many datasets (

Indexed as

immune signaturemolecular subtypesprognosistriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID26942074
PMCPMC4760294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.