Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26941751›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2016

Carbon Nanomaterials in Agriculture: A Critical Review.

Arnab Mukherjee, Sanghamitra Majumdar, Alia D Servin, Luca Pagano, Om Parkash Dhankher, Jason C White

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Raman Spectroscopy of Fullerenes: From CMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arnab MukherjeeDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven CT, USA.
Sanghamitra MajumdarDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven CT, USA.
Alia D ServinDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven CT, USA.
Luca PaganoDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New HavenCT, USA; Department of Life Sciences, University of ParmaParma, Italy; Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts Amherst, AmherstMA, USA.
Om Parkash DhankherStockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst MA, USA.
Jason C WhiteDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been great interest in the use of carbon nano-materials (CNMs) in agriculture. However, the existing literature reveals mixed effects from CNM exposure on plants, ranging from enhanced crop yield to acute cytotoxicity and genetic alteration. These seemingly inconsistent research-outcomes, taken with the current technological limitations for in situ CNM detection, present significant hurdles to the wide scale use of CNMs in agriculture. The objective of this review is to evaluate the current literature, including studies with both positive and negative effects of different CNMs (e.g., carbon nano-tubes, fullerenes, carbon nanoparticles, and carbon nano-horns, among others) on terrestrial plants and associated soil-dwelling microbes. The effects of CNMs on the uptake of various co-contaminants will also be discussed. Last, we highlight critical knowledge gaps, including the need for more soil-based investigations under environmentally relevant conditions. In addition, efforts need to be focused on better understanding of the underlying mechanism of CNM-plant interactions.

Indexed as

carbon nano-materialsCNM-plant interactionsco-contaminantssoil-microbestoxicity

Identifiers

PMID26941751
PMCPMC4762280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.