ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016
Changes in the Relative Abundance of Two Saccharomyces Species from Oak Forests to Wine Fermentations.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Divergent metallothionein strategies underlie copper tolerance in Saccharomyces species relevant to winemaking.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Harnessing the Enzymatic Potential of Indigenous Yeast Strains: Screening and Evaluation for Biocontrol and Oenological Advancements.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Distribution of yeast species and their resistance to copper and sulfite across arboreal and viticulture habitats.FEMS yeast research · 2026Article
- Fermentation-Driven Valorization of Cashew Apple: Combined Influence of Terroir, Fruit Phenotype, and Clarification Level on Microbial and Biochemical Composition.International journal of food science · 2026Article
- Colonization of vineyards by non-bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The Natural Fermentation of Greek Tsounati Olives: Microbiome Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- The distribution of beneficial mutational effects between two sister yeast species poorly explains natural outcomes of vineyard adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Extensive sampling ofGenome research · 2022Article
- Sources and Assembly of Microbial Communities in Vineyards as a Functional Component of Winegrowing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Article
- An update on the diversity, ecology and biogeography of the Saccharomyces genus.FEMS yeast research · 2020Review
- Occurrence and Molecular Identification of Wild Yeasts from Jimma Zone, South West Ethiopia.Microorganisms · 2019Article
- Multiple Changes Underlie Allelic Divergence ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Targeted metagenomics approach to capture the biodiversity of Saccharomyces genus in wild environments.Environmental microbiology reports · 2019Article
- Habitat Predicts Levels of Genetic Admixture inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its sibling species Saccharomyces paradoxus are known to inhabit temperate arboreal habitats across the globe. Despite their sympatric distribution in the wild, S. cerevisiae is predominantly associated with human fermentations. The apparent ecological differentiation of these species is particularly striking in Europe where S. paradoxus is abundant in forests and S. cerevisiae is abundant in vineyards. However, ecological differences may be confounded with geographic differences in species abundance. To compare the distribution and abundance of these two species we isolated Saccharomyces strains from over 1200 samples taken from vineyard and forest habitats in Slovenia. We isolated numerous strains of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus, as well as a small number of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii strains, from both vineyard and forest environments. We find S. cerevisiae less abundant than S. paradoxus on oak trees both within and outside the vineyard, but more abundant on grapevines and associated substrates. Analysis of the uncultured microbiome shows, that both S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus are rare species in soil and bark samples, but can be much more common in grape must. In contrast to S. paradoxus, European strains of S. cerevisiae have acquired multiple traits thought to be important for life in the vineyard and dominance of wine fermentations. We conclude, that S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus currently share both vineyard and non-vineyard habitats in Slovenia and we discuss factors relevant to their global distribution and relative abundance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.