Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26941446›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2016

Statement of the AGO Kommission Ovar, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO Austria and AGO Switzerland Regarding the Use of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Ovarian Cancer.

P Harter, A du Bois, S Mahner, J Pfisterer, O Ortmann, C Marth, D Fink, F Hilpert, U Wagner, J Sehouli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

P HarterArbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Kommission Ovar.
A du BoisArbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe.
S MahnerArbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Kommission Ovar.
J PfistererArbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe.
O OrtmannArbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Kommission Ovar.
C MarthArbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Österreich.
D FinkArbeitsgemeinschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie und Brustgesundheit, Schweiz.
F HilpertArbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe.
U WagnerArbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Kommission Ovar.
J SehouliNord-Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The AGO Kommission Ovar already published a statement in 2013, warning about the uncritical use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) outside controlled studies. This statement has now been updated after the most recent literature was reviewed by AGO Kommission Ovar, the AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO Austria and AGO Switzerland. The authors conclude that HIPEC remains experimental. Its use is not recommended and should be rejected outside of prospective controlled trials.

Indexed as

HIPECovarian cancerstatement

Identifiers

PMID26941446
PMCPMC4771502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.