Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26941429›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2016

Advancing Pharmacogenomics Education in the Core PharmD Curriculum through Student Personal Genomic Testing.

Solomon M Adams, Kacey B Anderson, James C Coons, Randall B Smith, Susan M Meyer, Lisa S Parker, Philip E Empey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Characteristics and evaluation outcomes of genomics curricula for health professional students: a systematic literature review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Solomon M AdamsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy.
Kacey B AndersonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy.
James C CoonsDepartment of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy.
Randall B SmithDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy.
Susan M MeyerDepartment of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy.
Lisa S ParkerDepartment of Human Genetics, Graduate School of Public Health University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Philip E EmpeyDepartment of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy.

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstitutionKL2TR000146 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$8.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop, implement, and evaluate "Test2Learn" a program to enhance pharmacogenomics education through the use of personal genomic testing (PGT) and real genetic data.

designOne hundred twenty-two second-year doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) students in a required course were offered PGT as part of a larger program approach to teach pharmacogenomics within a robust ethical framework. The program added novel learning objectives, lecture materials, analysis tools, and exercises using individual-level and population-level genetic data. Outcomes were assessed with objective measures and pre/post survey instruments. ASSESSMENT: One hundred students (82%) underwent PGT. Knowledge significantly improved on multiple assessments. Genotyped students reported a greater increase in confidence in understanding test results by the end of the course. Similarly, undergoing PGT improved student's self-perceived ability to empathize with patients compared to those not genotyped. Most students (71%) reported feeling PGT was an important part of the course, and 60% reported they had a better understanding of pharmacogenomics specifically because of the opportunity.

conclusionImplementation of PGT in the core pharmacy curriculum was feasible, well-received, and enhanced student learning of pharmacogenomics.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingStudents, PharmacyCurriculumEducation, Pharmacy, GraduateGenomicsHumansLearningPharmacogeneticsactive learningcurriculumgeneticspersonal genomic testingpharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID26941429
PMCPMC4776296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.