Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26941250›Full record

ArticleGenome research2016

Sister chromatid telomere fusions, but not NHEJ-mediated inter-chromosomal telomere fusions, occur independently of DNA ligases 3 and 4.

Kate Liddiard, Brian Ruis, Taylor Takasugi, Adam Harvey, Kevin E Ashelford, Eric A Hendrickson, Duncan M Baird

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mechanistic origins of diverse genome rearrangements in cancer.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Telomere fusions and translocations: a bridge too far?Current opinion in genetics & development · 2020
    Review
  18. Chromothripsis and telomere crisis: engines of genome instability.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. CtIP is essential for telomere replication.Nucleic acids research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kate LiddiardInstitute of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom;
Brian RuisDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Taylor TakasugiDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Adam HarveyDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Kevin E AshelfordInstitute of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom;
Eric A HendricksonDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Duncan M BairdInstitute of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom;

Funding

The mechanism of Cas9/CRISPR-initiated genome modification in human somatic cellsR01GM088351 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HENDRICKSON, ERIC A · 2010 to 2018
$2.3M
Ligase III regulates survival from crisis induced by gradual telomere shorteningR01CA190492 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HENDRICKSON, ERIC A · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Ku regulates non-homologous end joining pathways in human somatic cellsR01CA154461 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HENDRICKSON, ERIC A · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
Cancer Research UK 18246NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154461NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190492NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088351Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telomeres shorten with each cell division and can ultimately become substrates for nonhomologous end-joining repair, leading to large-scale genomic rearrangements of the kind frequently observed in human cancers. We have characterized more than 1400 telomere fusion events at the single-molecule level, using a combination of high-throughput sequence analysis together with experimentally induced telomeric double-stranded DNA breaks. We show that a single chromosomal dysfunctional telomere can fuse with diverse nontelomeric genomic loci, even in the presence of an otherwise stable genome, and that fusion predominates in coding regions. Fusion frequency was markedly increased in the absence of TP53 checkpoint control and significantly modulated by the cellular capacity for classical, versus alternative, nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). We observed a striking reduction in inter-chromosomal fusion events in cells lacking DNA ligase 4, in contrast to a remarkably consistent profile of intra-chromosomal fusion in the context of multiple genetic knockouts, including DNA ligase 3 and 4 double-knockouts. We reveal distinct mutational signatures associated with classical NHEJ-mediated inter-chromosomal, as opposed to alternative NHEJ-mediated intra-chromosomal, telomere fusions and evidence for an unanticipated sufficiency of DNA ligase 1 for these intra-chromosomal events. Our findings have implications for mechanisms driving cancer genome evolution.

Indexed as

ChromatidsChromosomes, HumanDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA End-Joining RepairDNA Ligase ATPNeoplasmsTelomereCell Line, TumorGene DeletionHumansTumor Suppressor Protein p53DNA Ligase ATPLIG4 protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID26941250
PMCPMC4864465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.