Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26940968›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2016

The Complexity of Multiple Contraceptive Method Use and the Anxiety That Informs It: Implications for Theory and Practice.

Lori Frohwirth, Nakeisha Blades, Ann M Moore, Heather Wurtz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Understanding contraceptive failure: an analysis of qualitative narratives.Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Perceived Barriers of Using Modern Family Planning Methods among Women in Jordan: A Qualitative Study.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lori FrohwirthResearch Division, Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10038, USA. lfrohwirth@guttmacher.org.
Nakeisha BladesResearch Division, Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10038, USA.
Ann M MooreResearch Division, Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10038, USA.
Heather WurtzDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences/Anthropology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Guttmacher Institute · USColumbia University · US

Funding

Research Infrastructure for Demographic and Behavioral Population Science Dissemination CoreR24HD074034 · NICHD · GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE · PI KOST, KATHRYN L · 2013 to 2017
$462k
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD074034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite clinical guidelines and national data describing the use of one contraceptive method as the best and most common way to prevent unintended pregnancy, limited evidence indicates a more complex picture of actual contraceptive practice. Face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted in November of 2013 with a sample of women from two cities in the United States (n = 52). The interviews explored the ways participants used contraception to protect themselves from unintended pregnancy over the past 12 months. Most respondents reported using multiple methods, many of which are considered to be less-effective, within this timeframe. The practice of combining methods in order to increase one's level of protection from pregnancy was prevalent, and was mainly enacted in two ways: by backing up inconsistent method use with other methods and by "buttressing" methods. These practices were found to be more common, and more complex, than previously described in the literature. These behaviors were mainly informed by a deep anxiety about both the efficacy of contraceptive methods, and about respondents' own perceived ability to prevent pregnancy. These findings challenge prevailing assumptions about women's contraceptive method use and have implications for clinical contraceptive counseling practice.

Indexed as

AnxietyAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorCounselingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMotivationPregnancyUnited StatesContraceptionMultiple method useQualitativeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26940968
PMCPMC5050243
OpenAlexW2291713278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.