Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26940878›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2016

ATR Kinase Inhibition Protects Non-cycling Cells from the Lethal Effects of DNA Damage and Transcription Stress.

Michael G Kemp, Aziz Sancar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The 6-4 photoproduct is the trigger of UV-induced replication blockage and ATR activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. A novel role for ATR/Rad3 in G1 phase.Scientific reports · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael G KempFrom the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 kemp.2@wright.edu.
Aziz SancarFrom the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 aziz_sancar@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Molecular Mechanism of Mammalian DNA Excision Repair, DNA Damage Checkpoints and the Circadian ClockR35GM118102 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI AZIZ SANCAR · 2016 to 2026
$10.6M
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF UVRABC EXCISION NUCLEASER01GM032833 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SANCAR, AZIZ · 1985 to 2015
$8.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032833NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ATR (ataxia telangiectasia and Rad-3-related) is a protein kinase that maintains genome stability and halts cell cycle phase transitions in response to DNA lesions that block DNA polymerase movement. These DNA replication-associated features of ATR function have led to the emergence of ATR kinase inhibitors as potential adjuvants for DNA-damaging cancer chemotherapeutics. However, whether ATR affects the genotoxic stress response in non-replicating, non-cycling cells is currently unknown. We therefore used chemical inhibition of ATR kinase activity to examine the role of ATR in quiescent human cells. Although ATR inhibition had no obvious effects on the viability of non-cycling cells, inhibition of ATR partially protected non-replicating cells from the lethal effects of UV and UV mimetics. Analyses of various DNA damage response signaling pathways demonstrated that ATR inhibition reduced the activation of apoptotic signaling by these agents in non-cycling cells. The pro-apoptosis/cell death function of ATR is likely due to transcription stress because the lethal effects of compounds that block RNA polymerase movement were reduced in the presence of an ATR inhibitor. These results therefore suggest that whereas DNA polymerase stalling at DNA lesions activates ATR to protect cell viability and prevent apoptosis, the stalling of RNA polymerases instead activates ATR to induce an apoptotic form of cell death in non-cycling cells. These results have important implications regarding the use of ATR inhibitors in cancer chemotherapy regimens.

Indexed as

ApoptosisDNA DamageSignal TransductionAnimalsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Line, TransformedCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalHumansMiceProtein Kinase InhibitorsUltraviolet RaysAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATR protein, humanAtr protein, mouseProtein Kinase Inhibitorsapoptosiscell cyclecell proliferationcell signalingDNA damageDNA damage responseDNA repairgenomic instabilityRNA polymerasetranscription

Identifiers

PMID26940878
PMCPMC4861496
OpenAlexW2335392730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.