Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26940802›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation2016

Early Treatment in HIV Patients: A Cost-Utility Analysis from the Italian Perspective.

Andrea Marcellusi, Raffaella Viti, Simone Russo, Massimo Andreoni, Andrea Antinori, Francesco Saverio Mennini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Global & regional health technology assessment
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea MarcellusiEconomic Evaluation and HTA (CEIS-EEHTA)-IGF Department, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Columbia 2, 00133, Rome, Italy. andrea.marcellusi@uniroma2.it.
Raffaella VitiEconomic Evaluation and HTA (CEIS-EEHTA)-IGF Department, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Columbia 2, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Simone RussoEconomic Evaluation and HTA (CEIS-EEHTA)-IGF Department, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Columbia 2, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Massimo AndreoniUniversity of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Andrea AntinoriINMI "Lazzaro Spallanzani" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesco Saverio MenniniEconomic Evaluation and HTA (CEIS-EEHTA)-IGF Department, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Columbia 2, 00133, Rome, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITKingston University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveHighly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has modified the clinical course of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, reducing the rate of disease progression, the incidence of opportunistic infections and mortality. Several recent studies show early antiretroviral therapy reduces the risk of AIDS and HIV-related disease. The aim of this study was to perform an economic analysis to estimate the cost-utility of early antiretroviral therapy in Italy for managing HIV-infected patients.

methodsThe incremental cost-utility analysis was carried out to quantify the benefits of the early-treatment approach in HIV subjects. A Markov simulation model including direct costs and health outcomes was developed from a third-party (Italian National Healthcare Service) payer's perspective for four CD4 strata. 5000 Monte Carlo simulations were performed on two distinct scenarios: Standard of care (SoC) in which 30% of patients started HAART with a CD4 count ≥500 cells/mm(3) versus the early-treatment scenario (ETS), where the number of patients starting HAART with a CD4 count ≥500 cells/mm(3) increased to 70%. A systematic literature review was carried out to identify epidemiological and economic data, which were subsequently used to inform the model. In addition, a one-way probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed in order to measure the relationship between the effectiveness of the treatments and the number of patients to undergo early treatment.

resultsThe model shows, in terms of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained, that early treatment appeared to be the most cost-effective option compared to SoC (ICER = €13,625) over a time horizon of 10 years. The cost effectiveness of ETS is more sustainable as it extends the time horizon analysis (ICER = €7526 per QALY to 20 years and €8382 per QALY to 30 years). The one-way sensitivity analysis on the main variables confirmed the robustness of the model for the early-treatment approach.

conclusionOur model represents a tool for policy makers and health-care professionals to provide information on the cost effectiveness of the early-treatment approach in HIV-infected patients in Italy. Starting HAART earlier keeps HIV-infected patients in better health and reduces the incidence of AIDS- and non-AIDS-related events, generating a gain in terms of both patients' health and correct resource allocation.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCD4 Lymphocyte CountCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease ProgressionEarly Medical InterventionFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26940802
OpenAlexW2297437131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.