ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
Computational methods for ubiquitination site prediction using physicochemical properties of protein sequences.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methods to Study the Molecular Mechanism and Drive the Design of Protein Degraders.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Deep Learning for Predicting Late-Onset Breast Cancer Metastasis: The Single-Hyperparameter Grid Search (SHGS) Strategy for Meta-Tuning a Deep Feed-Forward Neural Network.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Leveraging Deep Learning, Grid Search, and Bayesian Networks to Predict Distant Recurrence of Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Article
- Predictive modeling for ubiquitin proteins through advanced machine learning technique.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based approaches for ubiquitination site prediction in human proteins.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Deep Learning and Machine Learning with Grid Search to Predict Later Occurrence of Breast Cancer Metastasis Using Clinical Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Identification of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway domain by hyperparameter optimization based on a 2D convolutional neural network.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Multi-dimensional feature recognition model based on capsule network for ubiquitination site prediction.PeerJ · 2022Article
- Mini-review: Recent advances in post-translational modification site prediction based on deep learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Computational identification of ubiquitination sites in Arabidopsis thaliana using convolutional neural networks.Plant molecular biology · 2021Article
- Article
- A novel protein descriptor for the prediction of drug binding sites.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Computational Prediction of Ubiquitination Proteins Using Evolutionary Profiles and Functional Domain Annotation.Current genomics · 2019Article
- DeepUbi: a deep learning framework for prediction of ubiquitination sites in proteins.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- ADPredict: ADP-ribosylation site prediction based on physicochemical and structural descriptors.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUbiquitination is a very important process in protein post-translational modification, which has been widely investigated by biology scientists and researchers. Different experimental and computational methods have been developed to identify the ubiquitination sites in protein sequences. This paper aims at exploring computational machine learning methods for the prediction of ubiquitination sites using the physicochemical properties (PCPs) of amino acids in the protein sequences.
resultsWe first establish six different ubiquitination data sets, whose records contain both ubiquitination sites and non-ubiquitination sites in variant numbers of protein sequence segments. In particular, to establish such data sets, protein sequence segments are extracted from the original protein sequences used in four published papers on ubiquitination, while 531 PCP features of each extracted protein sequence segment are calculated based on PCP values from AAindex (Amino Acid index database) by averaging PCP values of all amino acids on each segment. Various computational machine-learning methods, including four Bayesian network methods (i.e., Naïve Bayes (NB), Feature Selection NB (FSNB), Model Averaged NB (MANB), and Efficient Bayesian Multivariate Classifier (EBMC)) and three regression methods (i.e., Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO)), are then applied to the six established segment-PCP data sets. Five-fold cross-validation and the Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) are employed to evaluate the ubiquitination prediction performance of each method. Results demonstrate that the PCP data of protein sequences contain information that could be mined by machine learning methods for ubiquitination site prediction. The comparative results show that EBMC, SVM and LR perform better than other methods, and EBMC is the only method that can get AUCs greater than or equal to 0.6 for the six established data sets. Results also show EBMC tends to perform better for larger data.
conclusionsMachine learning methods have been employed for the ubiquitination site prediction based on physicochemical properties of amino acids on protein sequences. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of using machine learning methodology to mine information from PCP data concerning protein sequences, as well as the superiority of EBMC, SVM and LR (especially EBMC) for the ubiquitination prediction compared to other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.