ReviewJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2016
The prognostic value of non-perfusion variables obtained during vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging.
Review in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of the left ventricular ejection fraction reserve acquired by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with CAD and reduced stress LVEF.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMRI) Applications in Patients with Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2022: single photon emission computed tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Review
- Quality metrics for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: an ASNC information statement.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Review
- Improved Performance of PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to SPECT in the Evaluation of Suspected CAD.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- Prognostic value of absent left ventricular ejection fraction reserve with regadenoson SPECT MPI.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Abnormal vasodilator stress electrocardiogram with normal myocardial perfusion: Clinical decision-making and review of literature.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Review
- Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2020: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Review
- Left ventricular myocardial volume in CZT SPECT: Expanding the horizon?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Prevalence of abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging during the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Cases from a Busy Nuclear Cardiology Laboratory.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Impact of Valve Plane Alignment on the Repeatability of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in ECG-gatedMyocard ial SPECT Using Corridor 4DM.Annals of nuclear cardiology · 2021Article
- Auxiliary ischemic markers, the role of left ventricular dyssynchrony.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Examining a novel threshold for defining electrocardiographic ischemia with vasodilator stress.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Prognostic significance of ischemic electrocardiographic changes with regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2019: Single-photon emission computed tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Review
- Cases from a busy nuclear cardiology laboratory.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Cases from a busy nuclear cardiology laboratory.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Myocardial stunning by gated SPECT: An old tool reinvented in a stunning turn.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Risk stratification for renal transplantation: A role for heart rate response?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is an established diagnostic test that provides useful prognostic data in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. In more than half of the patients referred for stress testing, vasodilator stress is used in lieu of exercise. Unlike exercise, vasodilator stress does not provide information on exercise and functional capacity, heart rate recovery, and chronotropy, and ECG changes are less frequent. These non-perfusion data provide important prognostic and patient management information. Further, event rates in patients undergoing vasodilator MPI are higher than in those undergoing exercise MPI and even in those with normal images probably due to higher pretest risk. However, there are a number of non-perfusion variables that are obtained during vasodilator stress testing, which have prognostic relevance but their use has not been well emphasized. The purpose of this review is to summarize the prognostic values of these non-perfusion data obtained during vasodilator MPI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26940574What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.