ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2016
[Cornerstones of quality assurance in medicine in Germany. Important impulse for the situation in treatment of rheumatism].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Development of quality standards for patients with axial spondyloarthritis for use in Germany].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2022Article
- [Quality in acute inpatient rheumatology 2021 : Current aspects of the KOBRA quality label of the Association of Rheumatological Acute Care Clinics].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2021Article
- [Rheumatological care in the Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Rheumatism Center-a model for conurbations].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2019Review
- [Special treatment in rheumatology-cross-sectoral quality-oriented selective contracts].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2019Review
- [Memorandum of the German Society for Rheumatology on the quality of treatment in rheumatology - Update 2016].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2017Article
- [Standards of care for people with rheumatoid arthritis in Europe : Translation and comments of the eumusc.net recommendations supported by EULAR performed by a national task force of the professional organisations DGRh and VRA supported by "Deutsche Rheumaliga"].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2016Article
- [International quality indicators in rheumatology. Suggestions for rheumatoid arthritis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recently passed German hospital structure act (Krankenhausstrukturgesetz) stresses the immense importance of quality for the medical care of the population. How can inpatient and outpatient treatment in the field of rheumatology be improved and how can this be assessed? A very important basis for such measurement approaches are quality indicators, i.e. parameters that indicate to what degree a certain level of quality has already been reached or is planned to be reached in the future. The work performed by the German Rheumatism Research Center (DRFZ) and the Association of Rheumatological Acute Clinics (VRA) in Germany has already used certain quality indicators and this topic has been recently described elsewhere. International quality indicators have also been published in recent years, all for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the most prevalent inflammatory rheumatic disease and are the central subject of this article. This overview of proposed instruments for quality assessment in rheumatology is intended to initiate a broad discussion on the subject of quality of rheumatological care in Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26940558What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.