Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26940528›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2016

The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Summary of Proposals for Revisions of the Classification of Lung Cancers with Multiple Pulmonary Sites of Involvement in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification.

Frank C Detterbeck, Andrew G Nicholson, Wilbur A Franklin, Edith M Marom, William D Travis, Nicolas Girard, Douglas A Arenberg, Vanessa Bolejack, Jessica S Donington, Peter J Mazzone and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Concurrent spread through air spaces in dominant tumours impacts prognosis in synchronous multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Frank C DetterbeckDepartment of Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: frank.detterbeck@yale.edu.
Andrew G NicholsonDepartment of Histopathology, Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Service Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Wilbur A FranklinDepartment of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
Edith M MaromDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
William D TravisDepartment of Pathology, Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Nicolas GirardRespiratory Medicine Service, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Douglas A ArenbergDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Vanessa BolejackCancer Research And Biostatistics, Seattle, Washington.
Jessica S DoningtonDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, New York University, New York, New York.
Peter J MazzoneDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Lynn T TanoueDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Valerie W RuschThoracic Surgery Service, Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
John CrowleyCancer Research And Biostatistics, Seattle, Washington.
Hisao AsamuraDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Keio University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ramón Rami-PortaThoracic Surgery Service, Hospital Universitari Mutua Terrassa; Centros de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES) Lung Cancer Group, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
IASLC Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee
Advisory Boards
Multiple Pulmonary Sites Workgroup
Participating Institutions

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with lung cancer who harbor multiple pulmonary sites of disease have been challenging to classify; a subcommittee of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee was charged with developing proposals for the eighth edition of the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) classification to address this issue.

methodsA systematic literature review and analysis of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer database was performed to develop proposals for revision in an iterative process involving multispecialty international input and review.

resultsDetails of the evidence base are summarized in other articles. Four patterns of disease are recognized; the clinical presentation, pathologic correlates, and biologic behavior of these suggest specific applications of the TNM classification rules. First, it is proposed that second primary lung cancers be designated with a T, N, and M category for each tumor. Second, tumors with a separate tumor nodule of the same histologic type (either suspected or proved) should be classified according to the location of the separate nodule relative to the index tumor-T3 for a same-lobe, T4 for a same-side (different lobe), and M1a for an other-side location-with a single N and M category. Third, multiple tumors with prominent ground glass (imaging) or lepidic (histologic) features should be designated by the T category of the highest T lesion, the number or m in parentheses (#/m) to indicate the multiplicity, and a collective N and M category for all. Finally, it is proposed that diffuse pneumonic-type lung cancers be designated by size (or T3) if in one lobe, T4 if involving multiple same-side lobes, and M1a if involving both lungs with a single N and M category for all areas of involvement.

conclusionWe propose to tailor TNM classification of multiple pulmonary sites of lung cancer to reflect the unique aspects of four different patterns of presentation. We hope that this will lead to more consistent classification and clarity in communication and facilitate further research in the nature and optimal treatment of these entities.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaHumansLung NeoplasmsMeta-Analysis as TopicNeoplasms, Second PrimaryNeoplasm StagingPrognosisLung cancerLung cancer stagingMultiple tumorsNon–small cell lung cancerTNM classification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.