Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26940141›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroendocrinology2016

Comparative Perspectives on Oxytocin and Vasopressin Receptor Research in Rodents and Primates: Translational Implications.

Sara M Freeman, Larry J Young

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroendocrinology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed
34.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 199 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara M FreemanDepartment of Psychology, California National Primate Research Center, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7422-3440
Larry J YoungDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Silvio O. Conte Center for Oxytocin and Social Cognition, Center for Translational Social Neuroscience, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emory University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Yerkes National Primate Research Center Role of type-I IFN in regulating COVID-19 induced inflammation and pathogenesisP51OD011132 · OD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Joon Sup Lee · 2012 to 2026
$167.0M
The Impact of Oxytocin on the Neural Representation Social Stimuli P50MH100023 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, LARRY J · 2013 to 2022
$21.8M
Oxytocin Receptors and Social BehaviorR01MH096983 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, LARRY J · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
Young Development of a Novel PET Ligand for Detecting Oxytocin Receptors in BrainR21MH090776 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, LARRY J · 2010 to 2012
$963k
Integrated Training in Psychobiology and PsychopathologyT32MH073525 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI WALLEN, KIM · 2006 to 2010
$779k
NIH HHS P51 OD011132NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH100023NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096983NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH090776NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH073525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last several decades, sophisticated experimental techniques have been used to determine the neurobiology of the oxytocin and vasopressin systems in rodents. Using a suite of methodologies, including electrophysiology, site-specific selective pharmacology, receptor autoradiography, in vivo microdialysis, and genetic and optogenetic manipulations, we have gained unprecedented knowledge about how these neuropeptides engage neural circuits to regulate behaviour, particularly social behaviour. Based on this foundation of information from rodent studies, we have started generating new hypotheses and frameworks about how the oxytocin and vasopressin systems could be acting in humans to influence social cognition. However, despite the recent inundation of publications using intranasal oxytocin in humans, we still know very little about the neurophysiology of the oxytocin system in primates more broadly. Furthermore, the design and analysis of these human studies have remained largely uninformed of the potential neurobiological mechanisms underlying their findings. Although the methods available for studying the oxytocin and vasopressin systems in humans are incredibly limited as a result of practical and ethical considerations, there is great potential to fill the gaps in our knowledge by developing better nonhuman primate models of social functioning. Behavioural pharmacology and receptor autoradiography have been used to study the oxytocin and vasopressin systems in nonhuman primates, and there is now great potential to broaden our understanding of the neurobiology of these systems. In this review, we discuss comparative findings in receptor distributions in rodents and primates, with perspectives on the functionality of conserved regions of expression in these distinct mammalian clades. We also identify specific ways that established technologies can be used to answer basic research questions in primates. Finally, we highlight areas of future research in nonhuman primates that are experimentally poised to yield critical insights into the anatomy, physiology and behavioural effects of the oxytocin system, given its remarkable translational potential.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsReceptors, OxytocinReceptors, VasopressinSpecies SpecificityReceptors, OxytocinReceptors, Vasopressinmarmosetneuropeptidesreceptor bindingrhesus macaquetiti monkey

Identifiers

PMID26940141
PMCPMC4886472
OpenAlexW2288695197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.