Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26940107›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Point-of-care C reactive protein for the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection in NHS primary care: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to adoption.

Jeremy R Huddy, Melody Z Ni, James Barlow, Azeem Majeed, George B Hanna

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05286918 (Antibiotic Stewardship Through CRP-guided Antibiotic Treatment for Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05286918 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Antibiotic Stewardship Through CRP-guided Antibiotic Treatment for Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2022 to 2026Enrolled1,184ConditionsAcute Exacerbation of COPD, Lung Diseases, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsThe intervention (CRP-guided) group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. C-reactive protein-guided antibiotic prescribing for COPD exacerbations: a qualitative evaluation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeremy R HuddyDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
Melody Z NiDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
James BarlowImperial College Business School, South Kensington Campus, London, UK.
Azeem MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2357-9858
George B HannaDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPoint-of-care (POC) C reactive protein (CRP) is incorporated in National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for the diagnosis of pneumonia, reduces antibiotic prescribing and is cost effective.

aimTo determine the barriers and facilitators to adoption of POC CRP testing in National Health Service (NHS) primary care for the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection.

designThe study followed a qualitative methodology based on grounded theory. The study was undertaken in 2 stages. Stage 1 consisted of semistructured interviews with 8 clinicians from Europe and the UK who use the test in routine practice, and focused on their subjective experience in the challenges of implementing POC CRP testing. Stage 2 was a multidisciplinary-facilitated workshop with NHS stakeholders to discuss barriers to adoption, impact of adoption and potential adoption scenarios. Emergent theme analysis was undertaken.

participantsParticipants included general practitioners (including those with commissioning experience), biochemists, pharmacists, clinical laboratory scientists and industry representatives from the UK and abroad.

resultsBarriers to the implementation of POC CRP exist, but successful adoption has been demonstrated abroad. Analysis highlighted 7 themes: reimbursement and incentivisation, quality control and training, laboratory services, practitioner attitudes and experiences, effects on clinic flow and workload, use in pharmacy and gaps in evidence.

conclusionsSuccessful adoption models from the UK and abroad demonstrate a distinctive pattern and involve collaboration with central laboratory services. Incorporating antimicrobial stewardship into quality improvement frameworks may incentivise adoption. Further research is needed to develop scaling-up strategies to address the resourcing, clinical governance and economic impact of widespread NHS implementation.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisC-Reactive ProteinEuropeHealth PersonnelHumansInappropriate PrescribingInterviews as TopicNational Health ProgramsPoint-of-Care TestingPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchRespiratory Tract InfectionsUnited KingdomC-Reactive ProteinPRIMARY CAREQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID26940107
PMCPMC4785316
OpenAlexW2289103858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.