Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26940029›Full record

ArticleVision research2016

No difference in cross-modal attention or sensory discrimination thresholds in autism and matched controls.

Sarah M Haigh, David J Heeger, Laurie M Heller, Akshat Gupta, Ilan Dinstein, Nancy J Minshew, Marlene Behrmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Larger Receptive Field Size as a Mechanism Underlying Atypical Motion Perception in Autism Spectrum Disorder.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah M HaighDepartment of Psychology and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Electronic address: haighsm@upmc.edu.
David J HeegerDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Laurie M HellerDepartment of Psychology and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Akshat GuptaDepartment of Psychology and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Ilan DinsteinPsychology Department, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 653, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel.
Nancy J MinshewDepartments of Psychiatry & Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Marlene BehrmannDepartment of Psychology and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition · USBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILNew York University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Vision Core Grant- Design and Fabrication ModuleP30EY013079 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MOVSHON, J ANTHONY · 2000 to 2025
$14.2M
SYSTEMS CONNECTIVITY + BRAIN ACTIVATION:IMAGING STUDIES OF LANGUAGE + PERCEPTIONP50HD055748 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MINSHEW, NANCY J · 2007 to 2011
$9.7M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY013079NICHD NIH HHS HD055748NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD055748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism has been associated with abnormalities in sensory and attentional processing. Here, we assessed these processes independently in the visual and auditory domains using a visual contrast-discrimination task and an auditory modulation-depth discrimination task. To evaluate changes in sensory function by attention, we measured behavioral performance (discrimination accuracy) when subjects were cued to attend and respond to the same stimulus (frequent valid cue) or cued to attend to one stimulus and respond to the non-cued stimulus (infrequent invalid cue). The stimuli were presented at threshold to ensure equal difficulty across participants and groups. Results from fifteen high-functioning adult individuals with autism and fifteen matched controls revealed no significant differences in visual or auditory discrimination thresholds across groups. Furthermore, attention robustly modulated performance accuracy (performance was better for valid than invalid cues) in both sensory modalities and to an equivalent extent in both groups. In conclusion, when using this well-controlled method, we found no evidence of atypical sensory function or atypical attentional modulation in a group of high functioning individuals with clear autism symptomatology.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAttentionAuditory PerceptionAutistic DisorderCuesFemaleHumansMaleSensory ThresholdsSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAttentionAuditionAutismVision

Identifiers

PMID26940029
PMCPMC4811698
OpenAlexW2288718077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.