Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26939997›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2017

Developing a novel peer support intervention to promote resilience after stroke.

Euan Sadler, Sophie Sarre, Anthea Tinker, Ajay Bhalla, Christopher McKevitt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A scoping review of patient and public involvement in empirical stroke research.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Resilience in Stroke Patients: A Concept Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Euan SadlerDivision of Health & Social Care Research, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Sophie SarreNational Nursing Research Unit, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing & Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK.
Anthea TinkerInstitute of Gerontology, Department of Social Science, Health & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Ajay BhallaGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas Hospital, London, UK.
Christopher McKevittDivision of Health & Social Care Research, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBNIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0407-13228Medical Research Council G1001901/1Medical Research Council G1001910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke can lead to physical, mental and social long-term consequences, with the incidence of stroke increasing with age. However, there is a lack of evidence of how to improve long-term outcomes for people with stroke. Resilience, the ability to 'bounce back', flourish or thrive in the face of adversity improves mental health and quality of life in older adults. However, the role of resilience in adjustment after stroke has been little investigated. The purpose of this study is to report on the development and preliminary evaluation of a novel intervention to promote resilience after stroke. We applied the first two phases of the revised UK Medical Research Council (UKMRC) framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: intervention development (phase 1) and feasibility testing (phase 2). Methods involved reviewing existing evidence and theory, interviews with 22 older stroke survivors and 5 carers, and focus groups and interviews with 38 professionals to investigate their understandings of resilience and its role in adjustment after stroke. We used stakeholder consultation to co-design the intervention and returned to the literature to develop its theoretical foundations. We developed a 6-week group-based peer support intervention to promote resilience after stroke. Theoretical mechanisms of peer support targeted were social learning, meaning-making, helping others and social comparison. Preliminary evaluation with 11 older stroke survivors in a local community setting found that it was feasible to deliver the intervention, and acceptable to stroke survivors, peer facilitators, and professionals in stroke care and research. This study demonstrates the application of the revised UKMRC framework to systematically develop an empirically and theoretically robust intervention to promote resilience after stroke. A future randomised feasibility study is needed to determine whether a full trial is feasible with a larger sample and wider age range of people with stroke.

Indexed as

CaregiversResilience, PsychologicalAdaptation, PsychologicalAgedCognition DisordersFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHumansMaleQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionStrokeSurvivorsUnited Kingdomcomplex interventionpeer supportresiliencestroke

Identifiers

PMID26939997
PMCPMC5573937
OpenAlexW2289735284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.