Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26939923›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Young female cancer survivors' use of fertility care after completing cancer treatment.

Jayeon Kim, Jennifer E Mersereau, H Irene Su, Brian W Whitcomb, Vanessa L Malcarne, Jessica R Gorman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Fertility preservation decision-making among adolescents and young adults with hematologic diseases and their families in China: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Geographic Access to Fertility Counseling among Adolescent and Young Adult Women with Cancer in North Carolina.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Future of Treatment of Adolescents and Young Adults With ALL: A Vision for Collaboration and Equity.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Cancer Treatment-Related Ovarian Dysfunction in Women of Childbearing Potential: Management and Fertility Preservation Options.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Higher reproductive concerns associated with fertility consultation: a cross-sectional study of young adult male cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Fertility preservation in breast cancer with case-based examples for guidance.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jayeon KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jennifer E MersereauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
H Irene SuMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Brian W WhitcombDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
Vanessa L MalcarneDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.
Jessica R GormanSchool of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, Oregon State University College of Public Health and Human Sciences, 2250 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR, 97331-6406, USA. Jessica.Gorman@oregonstate.edu.
CHA Gangnam Medical Center · KROregon State University · USSan Diego State University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Research Education CoreU54CA132384 · NCI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CRIPPS, RICHARD MATTHEW, CROWE, SHEILA E. · 2008 to 2022
$20.7M
Research Education CoreU54CA132379 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ARREDONDO, ELVA M, CROWE, SHEILA E. · 2008 to 2021
$16.1M
The Reproductive Window in Young Adult Cancer SurvivorsR01HD080952 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SU, HUI-CHUN IRENE · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
Predictors of ovarian failure after chemotherapy in young breast cancer patientsK23HD058799 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SU, HUI-CHUN IRENE · 2009 to 2013
$546k
Training the Global Ready ScholarTL1CA133837 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COUTIFARIS, CHRISTOS · 2007 to 2009
$416k
NCI NIH HHS TL1 CA133837NCI NIH HHS U54 CA132379NCI NIH HHS U54 CA132384NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD058799NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD080952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the present study is to investigate factors associated with female young adult cancer survivors' (YCSs) use of fertility care (FC), including consultation or fertility treatment, after completing their cancer treatment.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, females between that ages of 18 and 35 years who had been diagnosed with childhood, adolescent, or young adult cancers completed a 20-min web-based survey that included demographics, reproductive history, use of FC, fertility-related informational needs, and reproductive concerns.

resultsA total of 204 participants completed the survey. Participants' mean age was 28.3 ± 4.5 years. Thirty (15 %) participants reported using FC after cancer treatment. The majority of participants recalled not receiving enough information about fertility preservation options at the time of cancer diagnosis (73 %). In multivariable analysis, those with higher concerns about having children because of perceived risk to their personal health (P = 0.003) were less likely to report use of FC after cancer treatment. Those who had used FC before cancer treatment (P = 0.003) and who felt less fertile than age-matched women (P = 0.02) were more likely to use FC after their cancer treatment.

conclusionsWhile most YCSs in this cohort believed that they did not receive enough information about fertility and most wanted to have children, the vast majority did not seek FC. The findings of this study offer further evidence of the need for improved education and emotional support regarding reproductive options after cancer treatment is completed. Targeted discussions with YCSs about appropriate post-treatment FC options may improve providers' capacity to help YCSs meet their parenthood goals.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFertility PreservationHumansNeoplasmsSurvivorsYoung AdultCancer survivorCancer treatmentFemaleFertility care

Identifiers

PMID26939923
PMCPMC4879047
OpenAlexW2288389662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.