Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26939695›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2016

Community point distribution of insecticide-treated bed nets and community health worker hang-up visits in rural Zambia: a decision-focused evaluation.

Paul Wang, Alison L Connor, Ammar S Joudeh, Jeffrey Steinberg, Ketty Ndhlovu, Musanda Siyolwe, Bristol Ntebeka, Benjamin Chibuye, Busiku Hamainza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul WangIDinsight, 23B Twin Palm Road, Lusaka, Zambia. paul.wang@IDinsight.org.
Alison L ConnorIDinsight, 23B Twin Palm Road, Lusaka, Zambia. alison.connor@IDinsight.org.
Ammar S JoudehIDinsight, ADRI 1st Floor, BSIDC Colony, Off Boring Rd., Patna, Bihar, 800013, India. asjoudeh@gmail.com.
Jeffrey SteinbergIDinsight, 23B Twin Palm Road, Lusaka, Zambia. jeff.steinberg18@gmail.com.
Ketty NdhlovuMinistry of Health, National Malaria Control Centre, Lusaka, Zambia. ndhlovu.ketty@gmail.com.
Musanda SiyolweRufunsa District Health Office, Rufunsa, Zambia. madac_mopsiti@yahoo.com.
Bristol NtebekaWorld Vision, Plot No. 51/52, Great East Road, P.O. Box 31083, Lusaka, Zambia. ntebekabristol@gmail.com.
Benjamin ChibuyeClinton Health Access Initiative, 175 Kudu Road, Lusaka, Zambia. benjaminchibuye@yahoo.com.
Busiku HamainzaMinistry of Health, National Malaria Control Centre, Lusaka, Zambia. bossbusk@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2013, the Zambian Ministry of Health through its National Malaria Control Programme distributed over two million insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) in four provinces using a door-to-door distribution strategy, and more than 6 million ITNs were allocated to be distributed in 2014. This study was commissioned to measure attendance rates at a community point distribution and to examine the impact of follow-up community health worker (CHW) hang-up visits on short and medium-term ITN retention and usage with a view of informing optimal ITN distribution strategy in Zambia.

methodsHouseholds received ITNs at community point distributions conducted in three rural communities in Rufunsa District, Zambia. Households were then randomly allocated into five groups to receive CHW visits to hang any unhung ITNs at different intervals: 1-3, 5-7, 10-12, 15-17 days, and no hang-up visit. Follow-up surveys were conducted among all households at 7-11 weeks after distribution and at 5-6 months after distribution to measure short- and medium-term household retention and usage of ITNs.

resultsOf the 560 pre-registered households, 540 (96.4 %) attended the community point distribution. Self-installation of ITNs by households increased over the first 10 days after the community point distribution. Retention levels remained high over time with 90.2 % of distributed ITNs still in the household at 7-11 weeks and 85.7 % at 5-6 months. Retention did not differ between households that received a CHW visit and those that did not. At 7-11 weeks, households had an average of 73.8 % of sleeping spaces covered compared to 80.3 % at 5-6 months. On average, 65.6 % of distributed ITNs were hanging at 7-11 weeks compared to 63.1 % at 5-6 months. While a CHW hang-up visit was associated with increased usage at 7-11 weeks, this difference was no longer apparent at 5-6 months.

conclusionsThis evaluation revealed that (1) the community point distributions achieved high attendance rates followed by acceptable rates of short-term and medium-term ITN retention and usage, as compared to reported rates achieved by door-to-door distributions in the recent past, (2) CHW hang-up visits had a modest short-term impact on ITN usage but no medium-term effect, and (3) community point distributions can yield sizeable time savings compared to door-to-door distributions.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesFamily CharacteristicsHumansInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMosquito ControlRural PopulationZambia

Identifiers

PMID26939695
PMCPMC4778329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.