Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26939550›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Comparative genomic analyses reveal broad diversity in botulinum-toxin-producing Clostridia.

Charles H D Williamson, Jason W Sahl, Theresa J Smith, Gary Xie, Brian T Foley, Leonard A Smith, Rafael A Fernández, Miia Lindström, Hannu Korkeala, Paul Keim and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Molecular Typing ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Whole genome sequencing of neurotoxin-producingFrontiers in public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Opportunistic Features of Non-Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Unintended consequences: Renaming botulinum neurotoxin-producing species of clostridium and related species.Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Extensive Genome Exploration ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Charles H D WilliamsonCenter for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA. Chase.Williamson@nau.edu.
Jason W SahlCenter for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA. Jason.Sahl@nau.edu.
Theresa J SmithMolecular and Translational Sciences Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD, 21702, USA. theresa.j.smith.civ@mail.mil.
Gary XieBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA. xie@lanl.gov.
Brian T FoleyTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA. btf@lanl.gov.
Leonard A SmithMedical Countermeasures Technology, United States Army Medical Research and Material Command, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD, 21702, USA. leonard.a.smith1.civ@mail.mil.
Rafael A FernándezÁrea Microbiología, Departamento de Patología, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Centro Universitario, (5500), Mendoza, Argentina. rafael.fernandez@fcm.uncu.edu.ar.
Miia LindströmDepartment of Food Hygiene and Environmental Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. miia.lindstrom@helsinki.fi.
Hannu KorkealaDepartment of Food Hygiene and Environmental Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. hannu.korkeala@helsinki.fi.
Paul KeimCenter for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA. Paul.Keim@nau.edu.
Jeffrey FosterCenter for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA. Jeff.Foster@unh.edu.
Karen HillBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA. khill@lanl.gov.
Los Alamos National Laboratory · USNorthern Arizona University · USUnited States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases · USUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversidad Nacional de Cuyo · ARUniversity of New Hampshire · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClostridium botulinum is a diverse group of bacteria characterized by the production of botulinum neurotoxin. Botulinum neurotoxins are classified into serotypes (BoNT/A-G), which are produced by six species/Groups of Clostridia, but the genetic background of the bacteria remains poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to use comparative genomics to provide insights into the genetic diversity and evolutionary history of bacteria that produce the potent botulinum neurotoxin.

resultsComparative genomic analyses of over 170 Clostridia genomes, including our draft genome assemblies for 59 newly sequenced Clostridia strains from six continents and publicly available genomic data, provided in-depth insights into the diversity and distribution of BoNT-producing bacteria. These newly sequenced strains included Group I and II strains that express BoNT/A,/B,/E, or/F as well as bivalent strains. BoNT-producing Clostridia and closely related Clostridia species were delineated with a variety of methods including 16S rRNA gene, concatenated marker genes, core genome and concatenated multi-locus sequencing typing (MLST) gene phylogenies that related whole genome sequenced strains to publicly available strains and sequence types. These analyses illustrated the phylogenetic diversity in each Group and the diversity of genomic backgrounds that express the same toxin type or subtype. Comparisons of the botulinum neurotoxin genes did not identify novel toxin types or variants.

conclusionsThis study represents one of the most comprehensive analyses of whole genome sequence data for Group I and II BoNT-producing strains. Read data and draft genome assemblies generated for 59 isolates will be a resource to the research community. Core genome phylogenies proved to be a powerful tool for differentiating BoNT-producing strains and can provide a framework for the study of these bacteria. Comparative genomic analyses of Clostridia species illustrate the diversity of botulinum-neurotoxin-producing strains and the plasticity of the genomic backgrounds in which bont genes are found.

Indexed as

Comparative Genomic HybridizationGenome, BacterialPhylogenyBacterial Typing TechniquesBotulinum ToxinsClostridiumDNA, BacterialMultigene FamilyMultilocus Sequence TypingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNABotulinum ToxinsDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26939550
PMCPMC4778365
OpenAlexW2291075227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.